Mt. Cain Snowfall Update February 24th

While much of Vancouver Island focused on the fresh snow piling up at Mount Washington Alpine Resort, Mt. Cain’s conditions have followed their own pattern:

Recent snowfall: Mt. Cain picked up a solid refresh, with the latest report showing 47 cm (19 inches) in 48 hours, including 10 cm on Saturday, Feb. 21.

Forecast: Weather models point to a light dusting ahead — roughly 0.7 cm, mainly Wednesday night. Temperatures are expected to stay cold and below freezing, which helps preserve the mountain’s existing powder.

Operations: According to the resort’s snow report, a couple of lifts are spinning, and there’s plenty of untouched powder off-piste. As always, official run counts and patrol updates can shift throughout the season.

Landmark Federal Indian Hospitals Settlement Opens Claims Period for Survivors

The claims process has officially opened for survivors of abuse at government‑run Federal Indian Hospitals, marking a significant step in acknowledging the historical harms experienced by Indigenous patients.

The settlement—approved by the Federal Court in June 2025—arises from a class-action lawsuit filed by individuals admitted to “Federal Indian Hospitals” between 1936 and 1981 who later reported psychological, verbal, physical, or sexual abuse. These facilities, operated by the Government of Canada, served Indigenous communities across the country.

Eligible survivors, known as Primary Class Members, can now apply for compensation. The claims window opened in late January 2026 and will remain available until July 27, 2028. Compensation ranges from $10,000 to $200,000, depending on the severity and type of harm. Estates of survivors who passed away on or after January 25, 2016, may also submit claims.

The settlement covers 33 federally operated hospitals identified as Federal Indian Hospitals. Former patients and advocacy groups have long described these institutions as segregated environments marked by systemic mistreatment. For many, including representative plaintiff Ann Cecile Hardy, the settlement reflects years of difficult reflection and offers long-awaited recognition of profound trauma.

Beyond financial compensation, the agreement establishes a Healing Fund, a Research and Commemoration Fund, and additional health and wellness supports delivered in partnership with Indigenous Services Canada. These initiatives aim to help survivors and their families in their healing journeys and to ensure the harms are formally acknowledged.

Officials note that class members who support the settlement do not need to take immediate action. However, those seeking guidance, assistance with the claims process, or legal advice are encouraged to begin preparing well before the 2028 deadline.

Nationwide mental health and wellness supports—including culturally informed services and 24/7 helplines—are available for anyone affected.

LEARN MORE AT https://ihsettlement.ca/.

What Happens When You Can’t Pay Your Property Taxes

For most homeowners in Sayward, paying property taxes is a routine annual responsibility. But when finances tighten, falling behind can quickly become overwhelming. Knowing how the process works in British Columbia—and how it applies specifically in the Village of Sayward—helps residents make informed choices before the situation becomes serious.

Property Taxes Are a Legal Obligation

In British Columbia, municipal property taxes are mandatory. They are secured against the property itself rather than the individual owner. As a result, unpaid taxes stay with the land, regardless of who owns it or whether the property is refinanced.

If taxes are not paid by the annual deadline (usually July 2), penalties are applied immediately. In Sayward, as in most BC municipalities, a 10% penalty is added to any outstanding balance—even if only a small amount is overdue.

Year One: Arrears and Penalties

During the first year of non-payment, taxes move into arrears. Interest may also accumulate depending on local policy. The homeowner still retains full ownership, but the debt continues to grow.

Partial payments are typically allowed and can reduce interest charges, though they do not reverse penalties already applied.

Year Two and Beyond: The Property Tax Sale

If taxes remain unpaid for three consecutive years, the property becomes eligible for a tax sale. In BC, tax sales take place annually on the last Monday of September.

At a tax sale:

The municipality auctions the property to recover unpaid taxes, interest, and associated costs.
The opening bid equals the amount owed—not the property’s market value.
Properties may sell for significantly less than their assessed worth.

Importantly, ownership does not transfer immediately at the sale.

The One-Year Redemption Period

After the tax sale, the original owner enters a one-year redemption period. During this time, the homeowner can reclaim the property by paying:

All outstanding taxes
Interest
Penalties
Legal and administrative fees

If the full amount is paid within the year, the sale is cancelled and ownership remains with the homeowner.

If the Property Is Not Redeemed

If the homeowner does not redeem the property within the one-year period:

Ownership is legally transferred to the tax sale purchaser.
The former owner permanently loses the property.
No compensation is provided for any remaining equity.

This means a home worth hundreds of thousands of dollars can be lost over a relatively small tax debt.

Can the Municipality Take Your Home Directly?

BC municipalities cannot simply seize a property for unpaid taxes. They must follow the tax sale process. However, the end result—loss of the home—can still occur if taxes remain unpaid long enough.

Options for Homeowners Facing Difficulty

Homeowners who are struggling should act early. Possible steps include:

Contacting the Village for clarification or to discuss payment timing
Exploring refinancing or short-term borrowing
Applying for the BC Property Tax Deferment Program (available to qualifying seniors, families with children, and persons with disabilities)

Delaying action significantly reduces available options.

A Serious but Preventable Outcome

BC’s property tax enforcement system is strict but predictable. Losing a home over unpaid taxes is uncommon, yet it does happen—often because homeowners misunderstand the process or wait too long to seek help.

For Sayward residents experiencing financial hardship, early communication and a clear understanding of the system can be the difference between a temporary setback and a permanent loss.

Sign the petition for dissolution of the Village of Sayward

Signing the petition means your voice is heard in calling for: reduced administrative burden, governance improvements, respect of citizen concerns, fiscal responsibility and professionalism.

Sayward Taxpayers Alliance — A Grassroots Push for Fiscal Reform and Local Governance Change

In the small Vancouver Island community of Sayward, British Columbia, a new grassroots movement—the Sayward Taxpayers Alliance—has become a prominent voice calling for fiscal restraint, government reform, and a fresh look at how local services are delivered. Formed by concerned residents, the Alliance reflects growing unease about rising municipal costs, increasing tax burdens, and the long‑term sustainability of Sayward’s current governance structure.

Origins and Purpose

The Sayward Taxpayers Alliance describes itself as “a grassroots alliance of citizens who are opposed to wasteful spending of taxpayer dollars.” Its mission is to push for stronger financial accountability at the municipal level and to ensure residents have a meaningful say in decisions that shape their taxes and community services.

A Bold Proposal: Dissolving the Village

Central to the Alliance’s platform is a significant and controversial idea: dissolving the Village of Sayward as an incorporated municipality and integrating it fully into the Strathcona Regional District (SRD). Supporters argue that this shift would streamline governance, reduce administrative overhead, and potentially deliver services more efficiently—ultimately easing the tax burden on property owners.

They contend that a small municipality like Sayward struggles to maintain a standalone council and administrative staff without duplicating services already available through the SRD. Dissolution, they say, is a practical response to the financial and operational pressures facing rural local governments across British Columbia.

Why Dissolution?

According to the Alliance, several potential benefits support the case for change:

Reduced Administrative Load: Sayward would no longer need its own council and municipal bureaucracy; instead, residents would be represented by an SRD director.
Stronger Governance Capacity: Regional administration, they argue, can offer more professional oversight and long‑term planning than a small, resource‑limited local council.
Possible Tax Relief: While not guaranteed, integrating services regionally could help stabilize or even lower property taxes over time.

These arguments echo concerns that have surfaced repeatedly in local news, including council dysfunction, resignations, and questions about financial planning and service delivery. For some residents, these issues signal that the village’s current governance model may no longer be viable.

Building Community Momentum

To advance the dissolution effort, the Alliance is organizing petition drives aimed at triggering a provincially guided governance review. Only eligible voters living within the Village of Sayward and aged 18 or older can sign. If the petition meets the required threshold, the process could lead to a formal review or even a community vote under the Local Government Act.

Beyond Governance: Life in Sayward

The Alliance’s work unfolds against the backdrop of a small rural community navigating broader challenges—from infrastructure needs to the cost of recreational services. Sayward relies on a mix of local, regional, and provincial supports, and debates about governance are intertwined with questions about long‑term sustainability and quality of life.

Looking Forward

As the Sayward Taxpayers Alliance continues its campaign, it has become a catalyst for deeper conversations about local democracy, financial stewardship, and the future of small municipalities in British Columbia. Whether dissolution ultimately moves forward remains uncertain, but the movement has already sparked a significant community dialogue about how to balance effective governance with affordability and local values.

Petition Form

Click on the petition to download a printable copy.

Feds Introduce Accelerated Immigration Pathway To Foreign Nationals Through Military Service

Canada Expands Express Entry to Address Defence and Strategic Skill Shortages

Canada has introduced new category‑based selection priorities within its Express Entry immigration system, adding certain defence‑related occupations to a broader list of critical skill sectors targeted for permanent residency. The change does not open the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) to foreign nationals. Instead, it creates faster immigration pathways for individuals who already possess specialized training in fields the federal government considers strategically important. These updates fall under Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada’s (IRCC) authority to conduct targeted draws from the Express Entry pool.

What’s Changing

Express Entry manages applications for the Federal Skilled Worker Program, the Federal Skilled Trades Program, and the Canadian Experience Class. Under the revised framework, Canada can prioritize candidates in specific occupational categories when issuing Invitations to Apply (ITAs) for permanent residence.

New or expanded priority categories include healthcare professionals, transportation workers (including aviation specialists), STEM professionals, skilled trades, agriculture and food sector workers, and select defence‑related occupations. The defence category focuses on individuals with technical or specialized expertise relevant to Canada’s defence and national‑security ecosystem—not on direct military recruitment.

Defence‑Related Occupations: What It Means

The inclusion of defence‑linked roles aims to address shortages in highly technical military‑adjacent fields, strengthen aerospace and defence manufacturing, support research and development capacity, and enhance logistics, aviation, and technical support infrastructure. Foreign‑trained military doctors, engineers, pilots, and logistics specialists may qualify for priority selection if they meet standard immigration criteria. However, permanent residency does not guarantee eligibility for the CAF. Enlistment still requires meeting citizenship rules (where applicable), fitness standards, and stringent security vetting. Security screening remains especially important for roles connected to national defence.

Government Rationale

Federal officials describe the policy as part of a broader economic and workforce strategy focused on filling shortages in high‑demand sectors, supporting defence modernization, boosting productivity in advanced industries, and aligning immigration with economic priorities. Canada faces persistent gaps in healthcare, skilled trades, and aviation. Rising global security tensions and NATO commitments have also increased pressure to strengthen defence‑related capacity. At the same time, public debate over housing, infrastructure, and immigration levels has prompted the government to moderate overall intake targets while refining selection criteria.

Political and Public Debate

Reactions across Canada have been mixed. Supporters argue that targeted immigration improves economic competitiveness, that Canada benefits from attracting global expertise, and that defence readiness requires specialized technical talent. Critics contend that immigration levels remain too high amid housing shortages, that prioritizing foreign‑trained defence personnel raises security questions, and that domestic workforce development should take precedence. Some commentators have also questioned how security screening will be managed and whether sensitive defence‑related roles should rely on permanent residents rather than citizens.

Broader Context

Canada has increasingly shifted toward category‑based immigration draws to better match labor market needs. This marks a move away from a purely points‑based ranking system toward a more targeted, strategic selection model. The new defence‑related category fits within that broader recalibration, reflecting both economic priorities and evolving geopolitical realities.

Security Implications of Prioritizing Defence‑Related Immigration

1. Rigorous Screening and National Security Safeguards

Canada maintains that foreign nationals prioritized for defence‑related occupations through Express Entry will still undergo full security vetting, including background checks, credential verification, and any military‑specific requirements set by the Canadian Armed Forces. These measures are intended to prevent individuals with concerning affiliations or vulnerabilities from entering sensitive environments.

Even so, analysts note that expanding immigration pathways tied to defence roles naturally raises questions about how intelligence assessments, security clearances, and access to controlled information will be managed. Permanent residency does not automatically confer the trust profile associated with citizenship, making robust screening processes essential to mitigating potential risks.

2. Dual‑Use Skills and Industrial Security

Many of the targeted occupations—such as engineers, pilots, and researchers—possess dual‑use capabilities that are valuable in both civilian industries and defence infrastructure. Skilled newcomers in these fields could strengthen Canada’s aerospace, logistics, cyber, and advanced manufacturing sectors. At the same time, safeguarding intellectual property, sensitive technologies, and classified research will require careful balancing of openness with industrial security protections.

Canada’s broader Defence Industrial Strategy underscores this approach, emphasizing domestic defence production, resilient supply chains, and expanded research and development capacity. The immigration changes align with these strategic economic objectives.

3. Geopolitical Context and Strategic Autonomy

The policy also reflects Canada’s effort to build greater strategic autonomy in areas tied to national security and critical infrastructure. By prioritizing immigrants with defence‑relevant expertise, Ottawa aims to reduce reliance on external partners and strengthen its own capabilities. Achieving this will require strong integration mechanisms, including training on Canadian security protocols, NATO commitments, and relevant legal frameworks.

4. Public Perception and Social Cohesion

Public debate around defence‑linked immigration intersects with broader conversations about citizenship, national identity, and social cohesion. Critics—particularly among opposition voices—argue that linking immigration to defence roles heightens concerns about loyalty, security, and eligibility criteria. As immigration policy overlaps with national security narratives, these discussions tend to become more charged and politically sensitive.

Political Framing: How Major Canadian Parties Are Positioning This Policy

The Liberal government, led by Prime Minister Mark Carney, presents the policy as a strategic modernization of Canada’s immigration system. Their framing emphasizes labour shortages, defence readiness, and national competitiveness. They argue that targeted immigration strengthens Canada’s sovereignty and ensures newcomers can contribute immediately. The policy is also tied to broader federal initiatives involving domestic research and development, defence exports, and industrial capacity.

The Conservative Party, under Pierre Poilievre, generally advocates for tighter immigration controls and stronger security measures. While Conservatives sometimes support aligning immigration with labour market needs, they argue for a more selective system with enhanced background checks and lower overall immigration levels. Their messaging highlights concerns about public safety, fraud prevention, and the strain immigration may place on housing, social services, and the justice system. They tend to prioritize citizenship and security considerations over expanding pathways for non‑citizens in sensitive sectors.

The New Democratic Party supports immigration policies that address labour market needs but places strong emphasis on fairness, settlement supports, and family reunification. Their approach focuses more on worker protections and newcomer integration than on linking immigration to national security objectives. They may welcome the recruitment of skilled workers while also calling for expanded services and safeguards for vulnerable migrants.

The Green Party typically frames immigration through the lens of social justice, sustainability, and humanitarian commitments. They prioritize inclusive pathways and family reunification, and their positions on defence‑linked immigration are less central to their platform compared with the major federal parties.

The Bloc Québécois and certain provincial parties, such as the Coalition Avenir Québec, emphasize greater provincial authority over immigration and integration. Their focus often centres on protecting regional cultural and linguistic priorities. From this perspective, federal initiatives involving defence‑linked immigration may be met with caution if they do not align with provincial labour needs or cultural objectives.

Summary: Where Policy Meets Politics

Prioritizing defence‑related skills through immigration can strengthen Canada’s strategic workforce and industrial capacity, but it also requires rigorous screening and safeguards to manage risks associated with sensitive roles and dual‑use technologies. Politically, the Liberal government highlights strategic economic and security benefits; the Conservative Party stresses the need for tighter controls; the NDP and Green Party focus on inclusivity, labour needs, and newcomer supports; and regional parties emphasize provincial control and cultural considerations.

Village Of Sayward Residents Face 42% Tax Increase With Dysfunctional Council

The Village of Sayward is preparing for a steep 42% increase in property taxes under its draft 2026–2030 financial plan — a dramatic shift for a community of fewer than 400 residents and one that underscores the severity of its financial challenges. The plan is expected to be finalized in April, but the scale of the proposed increase has already sparked concern, debate, and renewed scrutiny of the village’s governance.

At a Feb. 17 committee meeting, village CPA Jeannie Bradburne walked council through the draft budget and laid out the structural issues that have brought Sayward to this point. For years, she explained, the village’s expenditures have consistently exceeded its revenues. Rather than raising taxes or cutting services earlier, the village relied heavily on reserve funds to cover annual shortfalls. Those reserves, once a buffer against financial instability, are now nearly depleted.

With no meaningful surplus left to draw from, Bradburne said the village has reached a legal and practical limit: the only remaining tool to balance the budget is a substantial increase in property taxes. Even after implementing cost-saving measures — including cancelling programs and closing the Kelsey Recreation Centre, a facility that once served as a community hub — the gap between what the village spends and what it brings in remains significant.

The first draft of the budget projected a nearly 50% tax increase, but subsequent adjustments and recalculations brought the figure down to approximately 42%. For the average household, that means an annual increase of about $725, or roughly $60 per month. Sewer and water fees are also slated to rise, while solid waste fees will remain unchanged. Taken together, the total estimated monthly impact for residents is expected to be around $72.

The financial discussion quickly intersected with ongoing political tensions. During the meeting, Councillor Scott Burchett criticized the village’s high legal expenses in 2025, noting that a large portion of those costs stemmed from litigation involving himself and Councillor Sue Poulsen. The village is reportedly considering censure and potential legal action against the two councillors, and has applied to the province to reduce the required council quorum from three members to two — a move intended to ensure council can continue functioning despite persistent conflict and absences.

Sayward’s council has been mired in turmoil since the last municipal election. Two councillors resigned in 2024, citing dysfunction and an inability to work effectively within the current political climate. Their departures left the remaining council members struggling to maintain quorum and make decisions, further complicating efforts to address the village’s financial problems.

At the Feb. 17 meeting, Councillor Debbie Coates urged her colleagues to undertake a detailed, line-by-line review of the budget in search of additional savings. She argued that residents deserve assurance that every possible cost-saving measure has been explored before council approves such a significant tax increase. Village CAO Andrew Young added that declining provincial grants, rising operational costs, and long-term structural challenges have all contributed to Sayward’s precarious fiscal position.

The village’s difficulties have not gone unnoticed by residents. Some, frustrated by both the financial strain and the ongoing governance issues, have launched the Sayward Taxpayers Alliance, and a petition calling for the dissolution of the Village of Sayward and its integration into the Strathcona Regional District. Supporters of the petition argue that joining the regional district could provide a broader tax base, more stable service delivery, and relief from the political turmoil that has plagued the village.

Council is expected to reconvene in March to continue budget deliberations and explore whether the proposed tax increase can be reduced before the financial plan is finalized. For now, Sayward faces a pivotal moment — one that will shape not only its finances but also its future as an independent municipality.