Brewster Wind Project Update

Brewster Wind Project Renamed Yəyus Energy As Wei Wai Kai Nation Obtains Majority Stake In Project

A major renewable energy initiative on Vancouver Island is advancing with a new name and a strengthened emphasis on Indigenous leadership and clean power production.

Yəyus Energy—a 197.2‑megawatt wind project—is being jointly developed by Capstone Infrastructure Corporation and the Wei Wai Kum First Nation. Formerly known as the Brewster Wind Project, it sits within the traditional territory of the Ligʷiłdaxʷ peoples and is positioned to help meet the island’s growing electricity needs.

The project secured a 30‑year Electricity Purchase Agreement in December 2024 through BC Hydro’s Call for Power, ensuring long-term stability for both construction and future operations. Once operational, Yəyus Energy is projected to supply enough renewable electricity to power more than 50,000 homes across British Columbia each year.

Its new name, adopted in fall 2025, means “Always Windy” in Liq’wala, the language of the Ligʷiłdaxʷ peoples. The name reflects both the site’s natural wind conditions and the cultural importance of the region. The project’s logo was designed by Indigenous artist James Kwaksistala, selected through a community-led competition.

Wei Wai Kum First Nation leaders have called the renaming an important milestone that honours Indigenous language, culture, and stewardship in the clean energy sector. The partnership is being recognized as a strong example of how Indigenous communities and private developers can work together on major infrastructure projects.

Construction is expected to generate hundreds of jobs at peak activity, with additional long-term roles in operations and maintenance once the facility is running. The project is also anticipated to support the regional economy through local contracting and supply chain participation.

Capstone Infrastructure, a minority owner, says Yəyus Energy reflects its broader mission to expand renewable energy while advancing community‑focused development. The company operates a diverse portfolio of wind, solar, hydro, and biomass facilities across North America.

As regulatory and planning work continues, project representatives emphasize that community engagement and regular updates will remain central as Yəyus Energy moves toward the construction phase.

Yayus Project Map

More About BC Hydro's 2024 Call for Power

BC Hydro’s 2024 Call for Power was a competitive procurement initiative launched in April 2024 to bring new electricity onto the grid and meet British Columbia’s growing energy needs. It is the utility’s first major call for new power in more than 15 years and signals a substantial expansion of the province’s energy portfolio.

Key Objectives and Details

  • Target supply: About 3,000 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of new electricity annually.
  • Eligible technologies: Wind, solar, hydroelectric, biomass, and other renewable projects that satisfy provincial clean energy standards.
  • Timeline: Proposals were reviewed throughout 2024, with long-term electricity purchase agreements awarded near year‑end. The first projects could be operational as early as 2028.

Industry Response

  • Developer interest was strong, with proposals amounting to nearly three times the electricity BC Hydro aimed to procure.
  • Submissions came from regions across the province, including the Interior, North Coast, Peace Region, and Vancouver Island.

Purpose and Context

The 2024 Call for Power is designed to ensure B.C. has enough electricity to support population growth, electrification of buildings and transportation, industrial expansion, and climate commitments. It reflects rising demand as the province shifts away from fossil fuels.

SRD Electoral Areas Services Committee Inaugural Meeting – January 14, 2026

Recording of Committee Meeting

Video Transcript

** Transcription generated using automation technology and may not be accurate. **

00:00:56.320 You can imagine
00:01:03.120 just
00:01:20.960 One minute, folks.
00:01:38.159 Yeah.
00:01:39.200 >> Yim.
00:02:06.399 Hi everyone. Can you hear me?
00:02:22.480 >> Good morning.
00:02:26.239 like to call the meeting to order and
00:02:28.560 proceed with the election of chair
00:02:32.239 >> for 2026 and any nominations will be
00:02:35.280 accepted.
00:02:38.000 >> Director Money,
00:02:38.959 >> I would like to nominate uh Director
00:02:40.640 Wallally.
00:02:41.440 >> Director Wallally, would you accept that
00:02:43.519 nomination?
00:02:45.040 >> Thank you.
00:02:46.959 >> Are there any further nominations?
00:02:52.080 Third and last time. Hearing
00:02:56.239 none, we’ll declare Director Wallally
00:02:57.920 elected as chair for 2026.
00:03:01.840 >> And we’ll proceed with the election of
00:03:03.599 vice chair.
00:03:05.680 And again, nominations from the floor.
00:03:08.640 >> I’d like to nominate Director Money.
00:03:10.319 >> Director Mini, would you accept that
00:03:12.239 nomination?
00:03:13.280 >> That’s very nice. Thank you. Yes, I
00:03:14.640 will.
00:03:15.360 >> Thank you.
00:03:17.760 >> Any further nominations for vice chair
00:03:20.080 position?
00:03:24.460 [Music]
00:03:29.920 Sounds like there are not. So, we’ll
00:03:31.360 declare Director Money as vice chair for
00:03:33.680 2026. Thank you very much.
00:03:37.200 And over to your chair.
00:04:21.110 [Music]
00:04:27.440 Chair acknowledges we’re on the
00:04:29.360 traditional territory of the Lattach
00:04:31.120 people and the first item of business is
00:04:33.680 the adoption of the public agenda.
00:04:36.320 >> Move adoption.
00:04:37.520 >> Second. Second.
00:04:38.479 >> Thank you. All those in favor? That’s
00:04:41.600 unanimous and carried.
00:04:49.520 >> Dave, we have audio on teams against
00:04:54.080 >> no petitions or delegations this
00:04:55.840 morning.
00:04:57.360 Adoption of minutes for December 10th,
00:04:59.520 2025.
00:05:01.120 >> Move adoption.
00:05:02.240 >> Second.
00:05:04.080 >> Any discussion?
00:05:06.000 All those in favor? Unanimous. Again,
00:05:08.960 that’s carried. Item B, please.
00:05:13.280 >> Move adoption of the minutes of the
00:05:15.039 special budget meeting of the electoral
00:05:16.479 area services committee held on December
00:05:18.080 11th.
00:05:19.600 >> Second.
00:05:21.199 >> Anything there? See? None.
00:05:24.479 All those in favor of adoption.
00:05:27.520 That is carried. Unanimous. And item C.
00:05:31.680 You want it?
00:05:33.600 >> Move item C that the minutes of the
00:05:35.440 special budget meeting of electoral area
00:05:37.840 service committee held on December 15th,
00:05:40.560 2025 be adopted as presented.
00:05:43.440 >> Second.
00:05:45.440 >> Call the question on adoption. All those
00:05:47.039 in favor?
00:05:48.720 That is carried. That’s unanimous. Any
00:05:51.759 business arising from those minutes?
00:05:54.479 Seeing none.
00:06:01.600 Staff reports. Number one, ESA
00:06:03.919 development permit application statutory
00:06:05.840 rightaway DBS resources area D for
00:06:09.280 receipt. Move receipt.
00:06:13.840 Need a seconder.
00:06:14.880 >> Oh, second.
00:06:15.680 >> Sorry.
00:06:16.319 >> Thank you.
00:06:17.520 >> And I believe Kelty will speak to this.
00:06:19.600 Mr. Chair,
00:06:22.560 >> thank you. Good morning to the chair and
00:06:24.639 committee members. I’m presenting for
00:06:27.680 the committee’s consideration
00:06:29.120 environmentally sensitive development
00:06:30.880 permit area ESADP
00:06:33.600 numbered DP1D26.
00:06:36.319 This is an application and a statutory
00:06:38.960 right ofway or SRW for a public trail at
00:06:42.240 4271 4275 and 4281 Island Highway South.
00:06:49.280 There is a current
00:06:52.400 seven lot subdivision application. is a
00:06:54.720 strata subdivision for which both the
00:06:57.199 ESADP and SRW are a condition. The SRW
00:07:02.240 agreement is a community amenity that
00:07:05.039 the property owner volunteered as uh as
00:07:08.080 such at the time of resoning.
00:07:11.360 The three lots, the existing three lots
00:07:13.599 are approximately 60 hectares or 148
00:07:16.639 acres combined and have a land use
00:07:19.759 designation of rural residential and are
00:07:22.319 zoned rural residential community 1.
00:07:26.400 The SRW will provide a public amenity on
00:07:29.919 the site in alignment with the area D
00:07:32.400 OCP and will be located on the proposed
00:07:34.960 lots within the agricultural land
00:07:37.599 reserve of uh buffer of 15 m and that is
00:07:43.199 supported by the agricultural land
00:07:44.800 commission.
00:07:47.199 The ESADP is required as the development
00:07:50.080 is proposed within 30 meters of a water
00:07:52.319 course uh which has been assessed by a
00:07:54.639 QEP and to which riparian areas
00:07:57.199 protection regulation or wrapper applies
00:08:00.319 in addition to the area D OCP
00:08:03.039 development permit area. There was a
00:08:05.919 previous ESADP which was issued based on
00:08:08.639 a rejected rapper report from the
00:08:11.039 qualified environmental professional or
00:08:12.879 QEP at the October 22nd 2025 regional
00:08:16.639 board meeting. The DP was rescended
00:08:19.280 resulting in this new DP application.
00:08:23.360 The province and the SRD has accepted
00:08:25.919 the wrapper report and an additional
00:08:28.400 condition impact assessment or CIA as
00:08:31.840 attached to the report.
00:08:34.719 The project QEP was or has recommended
00:08:38.240 uh stream protection in and enhancement
00:08:41.679 areas for the wetlands and streams on
00:08:44.720 the site and measures to protect both.
00:08:48.320 Attached to the report is uh CIA
00:08:51.680 required to address the unapproved work
00:08:54.640 carried out on the site under the
00:08:56.240 previous DP.
00:08:58.240 The measures within the CIA include
00:09:00.160 restoration of disturbed areas within
00:09:02.000 the SPIA, removal of invasive species,
00:09:05.040 installation of permanent ESA fencing,
00:09:07.839 and environmental monitoring of the
00:09:09.920 work. A post-development report will be
00:09:12.160 received from the QEP to report on the
00:09:14.720 implementation of the protection
00:09:16.880 measures. And at time of future
00:09:19.440 development, a building permit, for
00:09:21.600 example, uh an ESADP application from
00:09:24.399 new owners is required in accordance
00:09:26.959 with wrapper.
00:09:29.760 The instream subdivision application
00:09:32.800 uh can receive a letter of approval from
00:09:35.040 the SRD should the DP be approved and
00:09:38.000 the SRW registered on title of the lots
00:09:42.399 based on the accepted QEP reporting and
00:09:44.640 the public benefit of the SRW provided
00:09:47.040 by the applicant. The issuance of the DP
00:09:49.600 and the registration on title of the SRW
00:09:52.560 is supportable.
00:09:54.480 >> Thank you. Happy to answer any
00:09:56.080 questions.
00:09:56.560 >> Anything from director?
00:09:58.000 You got any comments there?
00:09:59.279 >> Thank you, chair. I’m just happy to see
00:10:01.279 that this is moving forward again. Um
00:10:04.320 there was a lot of issues last year, so
00:10:06.399 uh I’m glad to see that it is being
00:10:08.320 sorted out. Thank you,
00:10:11.120 >> Mr. Wood.
00:10:12.560 >> Thank you, Chair. I have a question. Um
00:10:15.440 you mentioned uh in your introduction
00:10:18.079 here SRWs, which I think means uh
00:10:20.880 statutory rightway, and that’s related
00:10:23.040 to the trail that’s mentioned in the
00:10:24.880 report. I just when I was looking at the
00:10:27.920 report and the map that was provided in
00:10:31.120 schedule B, I couldn’t seem to
00:10:33.040 understand or see any indication of
00:10:35.680 where the trail was except for the fact
00:10:37.600 that in the report it mentions that it’s
00:10:39.279 been moved. Could you speak to where it
00:10:41.839 actually will be?
00:10:44.959 Thank you through the chair. There is a
00:10:47.279 uh schedule A as an attachment to the
00:10:49.600 SRW agreement and that is registered on
00:10:53.440 title as well and it was um intended to
00:10:57.040 be attached to the SRW agreement. Um if
00:11:00.320 you have not received it, it’s something
00:11:01.839 that could be provided. Um the S SRW is
00:11:06.079 registered or proposed registered along
00:11:08.320 the common property and along uh two
00:11:13.040 three of the proposed lots. So the
00:11:16.240 common property road of the strata lots
00:11:18.640 will become uh part of the public access
00:11:22.800 trail and then as it goes to the west
00:11:27.200 from the highway it will cross over
00:11:30.000 frontage of three of the proposed lots.
00:11:36.240 >> If I may have a follow-up chair. Uh well
00:11:38.640 I appreciate that information and in the
00:11:41.440 report that we received schedule A is a
00:11:44.320 very simple map from uh SR map staff I
00:11:48.959 suppose um it would be great if um that
00:11:52.880 information could be included in this
00:11:54.959 report or in this in this package be as
00:11:57.839 I believe that it’ll go from here to the
00:12:01.200 board and it would be nice if that
00:12:03.440 information was included there just for
00:12:05.839 the public and anybody that would like
00:12:07.920 to see where that trail will be. And uh
00:12:12.240 I was just had one other question if I
00:12:15.120 may and that was around um the report
00:12:18.399 talks about that there’s a man-made
00:12:20.639 blockage to the fish stream which is on
00:12:24.480 I think the adjacent property which
00:12:27.120 connects to the wetlands on on this
00:12:28.720 property that we’re discussing. I was
00:12:30.560 curious if there are any tools in our
00:12:32.079 toolbox or the province’s toolbox to
00:12:34.720 compel removal of the rock blockage
00:12:37.760 which would open proper access as it was
00:12:40.480 historically to fish to the greater
00:12:42.320 wetland complex which it the report
00:12:44.720 indicates there is coo and stickleback
00:12:47.279 in the lower parts of the creek.
00:12:50.639 Thank you through the chair. The fish
00:12:53.279 weir that you’re uh referring to is
00:12:56.000 historical was in place on an adjacent
00:12:59.279 property. That’s correct. Um with
00:13:02.399 development um a recommendation from the
00:13:04.880 province could be made or through the uh
00:13:07.760 water sustainability act application um
00:13:11.040 if any works are proposed.
00:13:14.399 That type of work is not uh regularly
00:13:18.079 undertaken without development taking
00:13:20.000 place. So that’s when we ant would
00:13:21.839 anticipate some sort of comment around
00:13:23.440 that.
00:13:25.279 >> Okay. Thank you.
00:13:27.279 >> All right. Call a question and receipt.
00:13:28.639 All those in favor? That’s unanimous and
00:13:31.279 carried. Director Rice like officer be
00:13:34.399 authorized to issue the permit.
00:13:36.720 >> Second.
00:13:37.360 >> Thank you. Director Winny. Any
00:13:38.639 discussion on that? Seeing none. All
00:13:40.639 those in favor
00:13:43.040 and that unanimous again. That’s
00:13:44.560 carried. Thank you. Number two. Request
00:13:47.120 for fun relief. Mchuan have priority D
00:13:50.160 for receipt.
00:13:51.360 >> Move receipt.
00:13:54.560 Need a
00:13:54.800 >> seconder.
00:13:55.519 >> Oh, second.
00:13:57.600 >> And I believe Kelty will speak to this
00:13:59.120 as well.
00:14:01.120 >> Thank you. Yes. For the committee’s
00:14:03.279 consideration, there is a frontage
00:14:05.360 relief application for two proposed lots
00:14:07.920 related to an active subdivision
00:14:09.839 application in electoral area D at 4050
00:14:13.279 Deerfield Road. The property is located
00:14:16.399 on a culde-sac at the end of Deer
00:14:18.480 Deerfield Road.
00:14:20.560 It has a land use designation of country
00:14:23.120 residential and is zoned country
00:14:25.199 residential 3 and is a total of
00:14:27.519 approximately 2.5 hectares
00:14:31.199 or sorry 1 hectare 2.5 acres. The
00:14:34.800 subdivision plan as shown within the
00:14:36.480 report proposes to equally divide the
00:14:38.720 lot and due to the existing
00:14:40.959 configuration of the parcel. The 10%
00:14:43.440 frontage requirement cannot be met and
00:14:46.399 it’s proposed for lot A as 4.95%
00:14:50.639 and lot B 5.63%
00:14:53.839 which requires frontage relief or
00:14:56.079 exemption. Frontage requirements are to
00:14:59.120 ensure adequate access uh is provided to
00:15:02.560 the lots.
00:15:04.800 Given the site constraints and that the
00:15:07.440 proposed frontage for lots will be
00:15:09.279 approximately 25 m which is suitable for
00:15:11.680 access and egress to the properties. The
00:15:14.560 frontage relief is supportable. Thank
00:15:16.880 you again
00:15:18.639 >> directors
00:15:20.800 on receipt. All those in favor
00:15:24.240 unanimous and carries. It’s a motion.
00:15:25.600 Director Ice
00:15:26.880 >> like to move item B that the committee
00:15:28.639 recommend with reference to section 512
00:15:33.519 uh paragraph 2 of the local government
00:15:35.360 act that the board approve the frontage
00:15:37.600 relief application for the two proposed
00:15:39.600 lots at 4050 Deerfield Road from the
00:15:42.880 required 10% to 4.95% for lot A and
00:15:47.600 5.63%
00:15:49.120 for lot B.
00:15:50.399 >> Second.
00:15:51.279 >> Any discussion? See none. All those in
00:15:53.600 favor?
00:15:55.759 That’s unanimous and carried. Item
00:15:57.759 number three, ESA development permit
00:15:59.759 application.
00:16:01.600 Move receipt
00:16:04.560 >> discussion.
00:16:05.759 >> I believe Kelty again.
00:16:07.839 >> Thank you.
00:16:10.720 >> Thank you. And again for consideration.
00:16:13.759 There um is an ESA DP application DP
00:16:18.880 4D25 from the property owner’s agent for
00:16:22.320 development within 30 mters of a water
00:16:24.320 course the catisfly creek and this is at
00:16:27.680 3796 South Island Highway in electoral
00:16:30.399 area D. The work proposed on this site
00:16:34.160 is for a pre-construction fill to be
00:16:36.240 placed and leveled outside of the
00:16:38.639 identified spas on the property at the
00:16:41.920 time of further development. Again, uh a
00:16:44.880 building permit application in
00:16:46.240 accordance with rapper and updated QEP
00:16:48.560 report is required and all applicable
00:16:50.639 regulations will be met. The project QAP
00:16:54.639 has provided a wrapper report which has
00:16:57.680 been accepted by the province providing
00:17:00.320 direction to the SRD that the DP can
00:17:02.880 proceed.
00:17:04.720 SP have been identified
00:17:07.439 along with recommendations for measures
00:17:09.679 to protect these areas including
00:17:11.760 temporary ESA fencing, vegetation and
00:17:14.720 tree retention, sediment and erosion
00:17:16.959 control and seeding of disturbed soil.
00:17:20.160 In addition, the environmental
00:17:22.640 monitoring of work and the and of the
00:17:25.520 water turbidity will be completed and
00:17:28.079 then a supporting post-development
00:17:30.320 report that would confirm the work has
00:17:32.960 been done in accordance with the
00:17:35.200 recommendations within the rapper report
00:17:37.039 will be received by the SRD. Should
00:17:39.440 there be any deficiencies, the QEP will
00:17:41.520 make recommendations to address those.
00:17:44.559 And based on provincial and SRD
00:17:46.559 acceptance of the report and of the
00:17:48.799 recommendations, the issuance of the
00:17:50.400 SATP is supportable.
00:17:52.799 Thank you.
00:17:53.760 >> Nothing from directors on receipt. Call
00:17:56.160 the question. All those in favor?
00:17:58.240 Unanimous. Again, that’s carried. Dice,
00:18:00.320 please.
00:18:00.880 >> Like to move item B
00:18:03.600 that the committee recommend approval of
00:18:05.360 the environmentally sensitive area
00:18:07.360 development permit DP 4D25 as attached
00:18:10.960 to this report. and that the corporate
00:18:13.360 officer be authorized to issue the
00:18:15.280 permit.
00:18:17.120 >> Second.
00:18:17.919 >> Thank you, Director Winnie. Discussion.
00:18:19.760 All those in favor? And there’s none
00:18:22.320 opposed. So that’s carried. And item
00:18:25.280 number four, excess easements
00:18:27.200 subdivision promise of BC electoral area
00:18:29.280 C for receipt.
00:18:31.679 >> Move receipt.
00:18:32.799 >> Receipt or second.
00:18:36.080 >> I think director said,
00:18:38.640 >> thank you, director. All right.
00:18:43.039 I believe Meredith will speak to this.
00:18:45.440 >> Uh thank you through the chair. Uh so
00:18:48.000 this uh report is to consider extension
00:18:50.080 of an existing easement to provide
00:18:52.000 access to the developable area of a
00:18:54.160 strata lot 5 within a proposed
00:18:55.760 subdivision on Quadra Island. Uh the
00:18:58.320 application of a new five lot bareland
00:19:01.360 strata uh subdivision has been received
00:19:03.440 by the ministry and referred to the SRD.
00:19:06.320 Due to the environmentally sensitive
00:19:07.919 areas and geotechnical conditions of the
00:19:10.240 proposed strata lot 5, an easement is
00:19:13.280 sought over a portion of SRD property
00:19:15.360 legally described as lot B district lot
00:19:17.760 134 sayward district plan BIP 64198
00:19:21.679 located at 617 Green Road. Under this
00:19:24.799 plan, proposed uh strata lot 5 will be
00:19:27.440 bisected by an existing driveway that
00:19:29.520 currently provides access by easement to
00:19:31.679 several adjacent properties, including
00:19:33.520 the SRD property at 617 Green Road.
00:19:37.520 A separate easement, VIP 64199,
00:19:40.799 currently exists over the same portion
00:19:43.200 of the SRD property that we are seeking
00:19:45.440 an easement for today. Uh so this
00:19:48.640 easement currently lengthens the
00:19:50.320 driveway access for the uh adjacent
00:19:52.320 properties and the request under
00:19:54.640 consideration is to uh share that
00:19:57.039 existing easement with the newly
00:19:58.960 proposed stratal lot 5.
00:20:01.760 Doing so would enable us to or enable
00:20:04.000 the future owner to access the
00:20:06.400 developable area of the proposed lot
00:20:08.400 strat proposed stratal lot without
00:20:10.960 passing through an environmentally
00:20:12.400 sensitive area. So given the above
00:20:14.799 constraints of proposed stratal lot 5,
00:20:17.120 the requested easement is supportable.
00:20:19.280 Thank you
00:20:21.760 >> directors. Director Mooney.
00:20:24.720 >> Thank you chair and um it thank you uh
00:20:29.120 for the report. I have a couple of
00:20:31.679 questions
00:20:33.200 um and they’re mostly because around lot
00:20:37.440 B being where our sewer plant is in Q
00:20:40.640 Cove. And um so I guess my first
00:20:44.159 question is is that if we’re extending
00:20:46.640 an easement um would that potentially
00:20:52.240 have a future negative consequence
00:20:55.679 um if we need to upgrade our sewer plant
00:20:58.159 and take up more space on the lot that
00:21:00.640 we might need in the future.
00:21:02.559 >> No.
00:21:04.159 Okay. Okay. That’s that’s good. The the
00:21:06.960 portion of the lot is currently a
00:21:08.640 driveway access for that lot. Um, so
00:21:11.600 it’s currently driveway and it would re
00:21:13.440 be retained as existing driveway.
00:21:15.679 >> Okay. So it’s not extending the
00:21:20.000 uh it’s not extending because I think
00:21:21.360 you said extending the easement.
00:21:23.679 >> Extending here is we’re extending the
00:21:25.520 permission to access this uh a piece of
00:21:28.240 land. You could think of it as sharing
00:21:30.240 driveway access if that
00:21:32.400 >> right. Okay.
00:21:33.600 >> Makes more sense.
00:21:34.320 >> That’s helpful. And so I also have
00:21:37.440 another question. Um because this map I
00:21:41.280 would imagine based on the size and the
00:21:43.840 constraints of this area that they will
00:21:45.280 be accessing the sewer system and it
00:21:48.640 looks as if the uh potential subdivision
00:21:51.760 will be have sharing a border along
00:21:54.320 Green Road. And I’m curious if this will
00:21:57.919 also extend the sewer service along
00:21:59.919 Green Road because I know you’ve we’ve
00:22:01.679 we’ve had conversations at this table
00:22:03.600 recently
00:22:05.120 um about about the cost of bringing the
00:22:08.240 sewer service along to the end of the
00:22:11.280 catchment area of the sewer service at
00:22:13.679 the other end of Green Road.
00:22:14.960 >> That is not contemplated as part of this
00:22:16.960 uh request today or the subdivision
00:22:18.799 itself.
00:22:21.120 >> Okay. So, we don’t it could be in the
00:22:24.320 future. We just don’t know. Is that what
00:22:25.679 I’m hearing?
00:22:26.320 >> Um, it’s it’s not part of the current
00:22:28.720 request. So, it’s not a the answer to
00:22:31.280 that question isn’t relevant to the
00:22:32.559 current need.
00:22:34.400 >> Okay. And my last question is around the
00:22:37.520 statutory right ofways that are on the
00:22:39.440 map on page four. They talk um about and
00:22:44.880 I’m not sure if those SRWs are already
00:22:47.440 in place or if they will be in place
00:22:48.960 once this is completed. And I’m curious
00:22:51.760 if those are publicly accessible and
00:22:55.120 will they connect with the property
00:22:56.640 which shares a tiny small boundary um
00:22:59.520 which we have a park in this sort of the
00:23:02.000 same area.
00:23:02.640 >> Uh the map on page 4 does display a
00:23:05.520 number of existing easements over this
00:23:07.919 property. There are quite a number of
00:23:09.440 different easements. They serve
00:23:10.559 different functions. Some are for um
00:23:14.080 like vehicle or pedestrian access and
00:23:16.000 some are for subsurface utility access.
00:23:19.760 So, um I believe the easement that
00:23:22.240 you’re speaking about is is the road
00:23:23.760 access. It does enable pedestrian access
00:23:26.720 to our park entrance.
00:23:30.400 >> Okay. Uh it Yeah. Okay. So, when it says
00:23:33.280 SRW, that doesn’t always mean human
00:23:36.559 people can access it. It might mean like
00:23:38.320 a sewer line is underneath it.
00:23:39.760 >> It could mean a variety of things
00:23:41.120 depending on the terms of the agreement.
00:23:42.640 Yes.
00:23:43.760 >> Okay. Well, I appreciate that. But
00:23:45.600 you’re saying that it will be providing
00:23:47.200 access to the park.
00:23:48.240 >> Yes.
00:23:48.880 >> Okay. Great. Thank you.
00:23:50.559 >> All right. Call a question on receipt.
00:23:52.000 All those in favor?
00:23:54.640 And this none opposed? That is carried.
00:23:56.320 The motion, director.
00:23:58.559 Thank you, chair. I will move that the
00:24:00.240 committee recommend that the chair and
00:24:02.159 corporate officer be authorized to
00:24:03.840 execute an access easement agreement to
00:24:07.280 extend easement plan VIP
00:24:10.720 64199
00:24:12.880 to proposed stratal lot 5 in subdivision
00:24:16.320 application 02383
00:24:19.200 C22 subject to subdivision approval.
00:24:24.159 >> Second.
00:24:24.960 >> Second by director Vanash.
00:24:27.840 All those in favor?
00:24:29.919 That is carried. Unanimous.
00:24:33.600 Number five, electoral area C official
00:24:35.360 community plan for receipt.
00:24:37.279 >> Move receipt.
00:24:39.039 >> Second.
00:24:40.799 >> And believe Annie will give us an
00:24:42.000 update.
00:24:42.720 >> Director Vanesh second as well.
00:24:48.400 >> Thank you to the committee through the
00:24:49.760 chair. This report is to provide an
00:24:51.600 update on the area C OCP review project
00:24:53.679 as we’re continuing work on phase two
00:24:55.679 being the community engagement phase.
00:24:57.919 This month we’re continuing work on a
00:24:59.440 mailout engagement workbook for outer
00:25:01.440 island and remote residents as well as
00:25:03.520 getting set for the first upcoming
00:25:05.919 community discussion um which will be
00:25:08.080 focused on settlement and housing on
00:25:09.600 Quadra Island specifically. Um, we also
00:25:12.159 recently completed another project
00:25:13.600 webpage update and we’ll continue to
00:25:15.919 update the website as sessions are
00:25:17.679 completed as we continue moving through
00:25:19.279 phase two. Thank you,
00:25:26.799 >> Dr.
00:25:28.240 >> Thank you, chair. Thank you for the
00:25:29.600 report. It was uh great to see some new
00:25:33.440 information on the website and I’m
00:25:35.279 really looking forward to the upcoming
00:25:36.880 community meetings. I have a couple of
00:25:38.799 comments and questions. I’ve been
00:25:40.400 receiving community comments from some
00:25:43.200 folks about the timing on the upcoming
00:25:45.200 community meetings at uh they’re all
00:25:48.000 starting at 5:00 p.m. I think this I
00:25:50.960 have heard from some people will mean
00:25:53.120 that people who are working off island
00:25:54.799 will likely not be back in time to
00:25:56.640 attend because they would often a
00:25:58.640 workday doesn’t end enable them to get
00:26:01.039 on the 4:30 ferry. Um, and I’m also
00:26:05.200 hearing from people who think that
00:26:07.360 having a 3-hour meeting over the dinner
00:26:10.320 time block
00:26:12.480 uh is a little bit complicated for their
00:26:16.400 ability to have dinner and go to a
00:26:18.400 3-hour meeting. So, I’m just curious if
00:26:20.559 consideration was given to a 6 p.m.
00:26:22.559 start or if it could be considered for
00:26:24.799 the future set of meetings scheduled, if
00:26:26.640 there’s any thoughts on that.
00:26:29.120 >> Thank you to the chair um and to the
00:26:30.799 director specifically. Um following our
00:26:33.840 meetings that were held uh late uh last
00:26:37.760 fall winter, um there was uh direction
00:26:42.080 or commentary around the 6:00 p.m. start
00:26:45.440 time, which we had um for the evening
00:26:48.159 meeting saying that people that were
00:26:49.840 arriving off the ferry would have to go
00:26:52.400 home and come back to the hall um to
00:26:55.440 participate in the meeting. So, it was
00:26:57.200 requested that the subsequent meetings
00:26:59.360 commence at 5:00 p.m., which we um did.
00:27:01.840 I believe at the last meeting um Annie
00:27:04.080 that we held on quadra um that was the
00:27:06.559 reason why 5:00 p.m. was selected for
00:27:08.640 this initial meeting um on housing and
00:27:11.120 settlement for quadra. We have indicated
00:27:14.080 um through correspondence with community
00:27:15.919 members and I believe also on our
00:27:17.279 website that our start times will be
00:27:19.120 variable um throughout these sessions in
00:27:21.919 order to try to accommodate as many
00:27:23.679 people as possible. We do realize that
00:27:25.120 some people will be coming um uh back on
00:27:27.840 the island at 5, some people would like
00:27:29.760 to go home and have dinner and come
00:27:31.039 back. So, we’re really hopeful that um
00:27:32.880 by staggering our start times throughout
00:27:34.480 these sessions that we’ll um do our best
00:27:36.320 to accommodate everybody. Um as we’ve
00:27:38.640 indicated to those that have reached out
00:27:40.640 specifically to staff um we have said
00:27:43.520 that um please do attend uh at whatever
00:27:46.159 time that you can make it for. Um the
00:27:48.960 sessions will be ongoing. Um you can
00:27:51.520 jump into a conversation at any time. Um
00:27:54.880 and uh comments that have been received
00:27:56.799 before or after you came will be visible
00:27:58.640 to you. So, we’re really hopeful that um
00:28:01.120 by doing this we can we can get as much
00:28:03.039 information um and input from from the
00:28:05.440 community as possible.
00:28:08.080 Okay. I appreciate that. Um the website
00:28:11.279 says that the discussions at the Quadra
00:28:13.360 Community Center are from 5:00 p.m. to
00:28:14.640 8:00 p.m. Might be helpful to add a note
00:28:16.960 there that um that’s what it says on the
00:28:20.159 website. I’m looking at the page right
00:28:21.600 now. So, be helpful if maybe it was
00:28:24.559 updated uh to indicate that people can
00:28:26.799 drop in
00:28:29.440 at whatever time they it works for them.
00:28:32.080 >> Sorry, can you repeat that?
00:28:34.480 It would be helpful if because it’s
00:28:38.159 states very clearly that it’s from 5:00
00:28:40.480 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. that it would be great
00:28:43.919 if people could know that they were able
00:28:46.720 to stop in at a later time and be
00:28:48.480 participant in the conversation
00:28:51.279 because it says facilitated structured
00:28:54.240 community discussion which I think a lot
00:28:56.559 of people would indicate if you weren’t
00:28:58.399 there for the beginning of the 3-hour
00:29:00.399 conversation then maybe it would not you
00:29:03.120 weren’t part of it.
00:29:05.360 So providing a little bit more updates
00:29:06.880 would be helpful on that.
00:29:09.520 uh through the chair. I think the times
00:29:11.919 provided on the website were the time
00:29:13.520 that we had the hall booked for. So,
00:29:15.679 we’ll be we’ll be updating that.
00:29:18.640 Oh, yeah. We were very careful through
00:29:20.159 the chair to to not indicate an end time
00:29:22.240 for these meetings. So, every um actual
00:29:25.600 poster that we had put um on the um
00:29:30.799 yeah, it says 5:00 p.m. We were very
00:29:32.559 careful not to put an end time because
00:29:34.159 >> on the website it says 5:00 p.m. to 8:00
00:29:35.840 p.m. on the website. So, I don’t know
00:29:37.840 where that information is coming from,
00:29:39.200 but um everything that we had posted on
00:29:41.360 our posters uh on social media and in
00:29:44.240 the um um bird’s eye indicated just a
00:29:48.240 start time because we really didn’t want
00:29:49.520 people to think that there was a a
00:29:50.960 specific end time. So, um we’ll have to
00:29:52.799 look to see where you where the 8:00
00:29:54.480 p.m. is because what I’m looking at
00:29:55.760 right now just has a start time of five.
00:29:57.760 So, if you share that with us, we will
00:29:59.120 for sure um give some um further
00:30:02.960 >> consideration to that. I will I’m very
00:30:05.679 happy to share that with you because it
00:30:06.960 actually kind of flows into my next
00:30:09.039 question. Um checking in about the web
00:30:11.679 page because the web page seems to be
00:30:14.640 the primary information portable portal
00:30:17.840 sorry for residents in regards to the
00:30:19.840 upcoming meetings and it shows info at
00:30:23.520 the top of the page about the meeting
00:30:24.880 scheduled for next week. But then under
00:30:27.679 project timeline when it says in
00:30:29.840 progress there is no mention of the
00:30:31.600 schedule of meetings which is planned
00:30:32.960 for the rest of the spring and early
00:30:34.240 summer and you have to click into future
00:30:35.760 phases
00:30:37.520 um to find the schedule of upcoming
00:30:39.120 meetings and the list of of what the
00:30:41.200 topics are going to be. And it’s there
00:30:43.039 that it says 5:00 PM to 8:00 PM at the
00:30:45.120 top of that uh block of information as
00:30:47.760 well as saying that the meetings at
00:30:50.000 Surge Narrows are from 11:00 am to 3M.
00:30:53.039 Um so I was actually just going to ask
00:30:55.279 if it would be possible to consider
00:30:57.600 moving that information from where it
00:31:00.240 says future phases into like the in
00:31:02.559 progress cuz it feels to me that those
00:31:05.039 things are in progress. And when we talk
00:31:07.440 about our OCP uh reports that we receive
00:31:10.320 here every month, when it speaks to
00:31:12.799 future phases, it’s more talking about
00:31:15.360 um drafting or revisions and approvals
00:31:17.279 as future phases. So maybe just uh
00:31:19.679 adjusting that would be helpful.
00:31:22.960 Okay. And then I also wanted to ask
00:31:25.440 about other forms of outreach and if
00:31:27.760 there’s other forms of communication
00:31:29.440 scheduled uh specifically around like
00:31:33.919 posters for the schedule of meetings
00:31:36.240 that could be displayed at like the
00:31:38.159 library or the Quadra community center
00:31:40.240 and the bulletin boards. Um I know
00:31:44.399 there’s a lot of people I think the
00:31:45.519 highest per capita use of the library in
00:31:47.360 SRD is uh at at Quadra Library. So, and
00:31:50.720 there’s a lot of folks that are analog
00:31:53.120 rather than digital. And it would be
00:31:55.039 really great to have some posters um put
00:31:57.279 up and potentially
00:31:59.760 further than that to share them at Serge
00:32:02.399 Narrows, at the post office and and and
00:32:04.640 such so that we can make sure that
00:32:06.240 people are um accessing that information
00:32:09.120 even if they’re not on the internet.
00:32:11.200 >> Uh thank you for the the comment and and
00:32:13.600 yes, we are already planning that. Um we
00:32:16.159 don’t do posting widely like on
00:32:18.080 telephone poles and things just because
00:32:19.679 that’s creates clutter and and waste.
00:32:22.720 But we but yes the uh the ferry
00:32:24.640 terminals the the fairies themselves the
00:32:26.960 library um there are some key locations
00:32:29.039 around Quadra Island that have already
00:32:30.559 been identified for postering. Yeah.
00:32:33.039 Okay. Great. The Quadra community center
00:32:35.039 has a great bulletin board and then
00:32:36.640 right in front of the grocery store
00:32:38.960 there’s a bulletin board which is
00:32:40.399 dedicated just to community center
00:32:42.320 events which would be and it’s sort of
00:32:44.159 more of a locked one. So it would stay
00:32:45.760 visible for longer. Okay, that’d be
00:32:47.840 great. And then I just have one more
00:32:49.360 question because the the poster for the
00:32:53.360 January 21st meeting says that it’s um a
00:32:56.799 facilitated and structured conversation.
00:32:59.279 I was curious if there will be outside
00:33:01.760 support assisting or if that’ll be
00:33:03.120 planning staff that will be
00:33:04.240 facilitating.
00:33:06.640 >> Uh thank you for the question. Yes, that
00:33:08.080 is planning staff.
00:33:09.519 >> Okay, great. Thank you.
00:33:12.320 Call
00:33:12.480 >> a question on receipt. All those in
00:33:13.840 favor?
00:33:15.840 Any opposed? Seeing none, that is
00:33:17.600 carried.
00:33:19.120 Number six, public land availability for
00:33:21.360 housing Harry Bay and Qui Cove for
00:33:23.679 receipt.
00:33:24.159 >> Move receipt.
00:33:25.440 >> Second. Second.
00:33:26.240 >> Thank you, director Rice.
00:33:27.919 >> I believe Meredith will speak to this.
00:33:30.960 Oh, yeah. Sorry.
00:33:34.320 >> Uh, thank you through the chair. Uh, so,
00:33:37.600 excuse me. Uh so this report is to
00:33:39.440 provide an overview of public land
00:33:41.120 available um near uh the designated
00:33:43.600 village centers on Quadra Island uh
00:33:45.760 which could potentially be considered
00:33:47.360 for future investigation to support uh
00:33:49.600 the development of housing. Excuse me.
00:33:53.600 So uh at the direction of the board,
00:33:55.279 we’ve located some public land near both
00:33:57.039 Quaioski Cove and Harriet Bay, which are
00:33:59.279 the two designated village centers
00:34:01.200 identified within the current OCP. uh we
00:34:04.080 were researching the potential to
00:34:06.000 support affordable and attainable
00:34:07.279 housing. Um there is an attached map
00:34:10.239 within the report and greater uh detail
00:34:13.679 on all of the identified public lands,
00:34:16.000 but of those that were identified,
00:34:17.760 there’s really only three sites that um
00:34:20.320 are currently undeveloped in a suitable
00:34:22.800 size and and some other uh conditions
00:34:25.760 that make them more suitable than
00:34:27.599 others. Uh though of course they all
00:34:31.280 have constraints.
00:34:33.359 Uh so without going into those specific
00:34:35.520 sites um they are all listed in the
00:34:37.359 report. Um and the full list is also
00:34:40.480 identified in the report. But should
00:34:42.079 further investigation be desired for any
00:34:44.239 of the lands uh identified here,
00:34:46.399 additional direction would be needed to
00:34:48.320 identify which sites we should pursue
00:34:50.079 further. Uh for provincial crownland
00:34:52.560 parcels, uh an appropriate next step
00:34:54.480 would be an inquiry uh to the relevant
00:34:56.480 land manager to determine the likelihood
00:34:58.320 of any form of disposition of that land,
00:35:00.800 including the issuance of a license of
00:35:02.400 occupation, a lease agreement, fee,
00:35:04.320 simple grant or market rate land sale.
00:35:07.680 The subsequent steps would be dependent
00:35:09.599 on the type of tenure being pursued. uh
00:35:12.160 would likely include uh the development
00:35:14.320 of a legal survey, development of land
00:35:16.320 use management plan, consultation with
00:35:18.079 First Nations, and a site site condition
00:35:20.320 assessments, which could include
00:35:21.760 environmental, archaeological,
00:35:23.440 geotechnical, uh portable water and
00:35:25.760 sewage disposal um assessments for lands
00:35:29.280 that are designated as SRD park lands.
00:35:31.839 Um it is worth noting that these lands
00:35:34.000 have been acquired and retained for park
00:35:36.160 purposes. And so while they may be
00:35:38.640 redesated as developable lands, it is
00:35:41.280 important to recognize that the benefit
00:35:42.720 of housing would come at a loss of
00:35:44.480 natural park space and the related
00:35:46.240 conservation habitat and recreational
00:35:48.400 benefits that those lands currently
00:35:50.000 provide. So should further exploration
00:35:53.040 be desired, um public consultation is
00:35:55.440 recommended followed by site condition
00:35:58.079 assessments environment including again
00:36:00.560 the environmental, archaeological,
00:36:02.240 geotechnical, portable water and sewage
00:36:04.560 disposal assessments. Thank you.
00:36:10.079 >> I wanted to say thank you for this great
00:36:12.800 uh report. It’s really comprehensive,
00:36:15.359 clear to understand maps and came back
00:36:17.680 really quickly. I really appreciate all
00:36:20.160 of that. And I think for me when I once
00:36:23.280 I looked at it, it really feels like
00:36:24.960 there are two provincial landlots of
00:36:27.359 particular interest identified in the
00:36:29.599 report. Um I think the report identifies
00:36:32.000 them as lot seven and eight in on Highen
00:36:34.000 Bay Road. Um, and those are the ones
00:36:36.720 that kind of sparked my curiosity in the
00:36:38.320 first place when I um when I was looking
00:36:40.960 at the provincial IMAP website and what
00:36:44.560 led to the request for this report. So,
00:36:46.240 I’m really happy that they made it onto
00:36:47.920 the report and um following receipt
00:36:51.599 chair, I have a motion that I would like
00:36:53.920 to make which I have provided to Edith
00:36:55.920 already. Thanks.
00:36:57.520 >> All right. Well, D, you have something
00:36:59.440 here.
00:37:00.000 >> Just question for staff. When I read the
00:37:02.400 report, it seems like there’s a fair
00:37:04.000 amount of of hurdles that need to be
00:37:06.800 jumped through. What is the likelihood
00:37:09.119 that anything can be achieved from this?
00:37:14.320 >> That’s a good question. I think that uh
00:37:17.359 there is certainly likelihood. We don’t
00:37:19.440 know what the current uh intent for
00:37:21.200 these parcels is from the provincial
00:37:22.960 perspective. So, without kind of opening
00:37:25.119 that line of inquiry, I can’t really say
00:37:28.079 with uh any certainty. Uh that said, we
00:37:31.359 do know that through our other park
00:37:34.000 processes to pursue 10 years, we know
00:37:35.920 that the province does consider that. So
00:37:38.880 there’s nothing today that would tell us
00:37:41.520 that they wouldn’t if if that makes
00:37:43.920 sense. Um it isn’t likely something that
00:37:46.800 would be concluded in a short period of
00:37:49.680 time. Uh tenure processes usually do
00:37:52.640 take a number of years.
00:37:55.680 >> Followup, please. Thank you for that.
00:37:58.079 And that was exactly what my line of
00:38:00.079 thought was thinking. And you know, here
00:38:02.000 we are. We’re in year four. And I’m
00:38:03.920 wondering
00:38:05.520 um you know, is this something that is
00:38:07.280 going to take a fair amount of effort?
00:38:09.760 What I would like to see staff working
00:38:11.520 on is our existing projects and get them
00:38:14.400 completed before the next election
00:38:16.000 cycle. So I’m just
00:38:19.200 I really don’t see a quick endgame to
00:38:21.119 this.
00:38:24.160 >> Okay. On receipt, all those in favor?
00:38:26.320 Oh, Director Vanesh, I see your hands up
00:38:28.000 there.
00:38:30.079 >> Thank you, Chair. I just want to give a
00:38:31.680 little bit of background.
00:38:32.640 >> Can you turn up your volume a little bit
00:38:34.079 more?
00:38:39.680 >> How’s that?
00:38:41.040 >> Tiny bit better.
00:38:43.599 >> Uh, I just want to give um a little bit
00:38:45.680 of perspective on on a similar situation
00:38:47.599 on Cortez where um there was a piece of
00:38:50.800 land owned by Ministry of
00:38:51.839 Transportation. the previous regional
00:38:53.440 director pursued it for 3 years and I’ve
00:38:56.480 been pursuing it since uh I I took this
00:38:59.040 role and it has only just finally uh
00:39:03.440 been announced that the the Ministry of
00:39:05.359 Transportation is willing to release it.
00:39:07.839 Um, and you know, I think these things
00:39:10.079 do take time and it it’s, you know, I
00:39:12.079 think it’s I’ve certainly been impatient
00:39:13.599 around the process, but just wanted to
00:39:15.359 let fellow directors know that that
00:39:17.359 these things do take time and and uh,
00:39:19.599 you know, taking the small steps to move
00:39:21.119 them forward is uh, ultimately worth it
00:39:23.599 in the end.
00:39:27.119 All those in favor? Any opposed? Seeing
00:39:30.400 none, that is carried. A motion
00:39:31.920 director.
00:39:34.240 I will move that staff investigate with
00:39:38.240 the Ministry of Forests and other
00:39:40.160 ministries as appropriate the potential
00:39:42.880 for disposition of lot 7 and 8 in
00:39:44.880 Harriet Bay noted on the report as zero
00:39:47.839 Hyestin Bay Road for development of
00:39:50.320 affordable and attainable housing on
00:39:52.000 Quadra Island.
00:39:54.960 >> I’ll second that.
00:39:56.240 >> Director to second it. Any discussion?
00:39:59.520 See none. All those in favor?
00:40:02.960 How are you voting? Dire’s
00:40:07.119 good.
00:40:07.359 >> Can you not see me?
00:40:08.800 >> I’m opposed.
00:40:09.520 >> You’re hidden.
00:40:10.320 >> Edith can. Yeah, he
00:40:11.599 >> support.
00:40:13.440 >> We just have the motion on the screen.
00:40:14.960 Director Vonnish. So,
00:40:16.560 >> we didn’t lose video with you.
00:40:22.640 >> So, you were How’ you vote? Director
00:40:24.400 Vanesh
00:40:25.359 >> in favor.
00:40:26.320 >> Okay. And Director Rice is opposed. And
00:40:29.040 that is carried. I’m in favor.
00:40:33.920 All right. Schedule of committee
00:40:35.440 meetings 2026 for a seat.
00:40:38.320 >> Move seat.
00:40:41.280 >> Do I have a second or just for a second
00:40:42.640 here?
00:40:42.880 >> Second.
00:40:43.359 >> Director second it. Thank you.
00:40:45.680 >> Nothing to add, Mr. Chair.
00:40:47.599 >> All right, Director Winnie.
00:40:50.240 >> Thank you, Chair. I have an amendment to
00:40:52.160 propose to the schedule.
00:40:55.359 >> All right. Well, when it comes time to
00:40:56.960 make the motion, I’ll let you make the
00:40:58.240 motion. We’ll see what you got there.
00:41:00.079 >> Okay.
00:41:00.880 >> Okay. So, anything else on receipt?
00:41:02.880 Seeing none, all those in favor?
00:41:06.319 You in favor?
00:41:07.440 >> Yes.
00:41:07.920 >> Okay, that’s unanimous and it’s carried.
00:41:09.760 And let’s have a motion then. Okay, I
00:41:13.599 will move uh that the proposed meeting
00:41:16.480 sorry the proposed 2026 meeting schedule
00:41:18.800 for the electoral area services
00:41:20.480 committee attached to the January 5th
00:41:23.119 2026 report from the CEO be approved
00:41:26.000 with the change of the March meeting
00:41:29.520 being held on Tuesday March 10th rather
00:41:31.440 than Wednesday March 11th.
00:41:36.960 >> I’ll second that.
00:41:38.800 >> All righty. Any discussion on that one?
00:41:41.280 I would just say that um the uh March
00:41:45.920 11th is the day that the uh electoral
00:41:48.560 area directors forum and local
00:41:49.839 government leadership academy begins. So
00:41:52.319 um it would be much more beneficial if
00:41:54.079 we could hold hold it on Tuesday, March
00:41:55.839 10th. I think we did the same thing last
00:41:57.599 year, changing it to Tuesday instead.
00:41:59.520 Thanks.
00:42:00.240 >> Call a question. All those in favor
00:42:03.200 and that’s unanimous and carried.
00:42:05.920 Mr. could you send out a little email
00:42:07.520 because I haven’t got a notepad in front
00:42:09.280 of me just to confirm the change of
00:42:11.280 date. Thank you.
00:42:14.640 Number eight, request for financial
00:42:16.560 assistance from electoral area B.
00:42:19.680 I’ll move that the report from the CEO
00:42:21.280 be received.
00:42:22.960 >> Second.
00:42:23.839 >> Any discussion on the report? See none.
00:42:26.720 All those in favor?
00:42:29.680 Any opposed? None opposed. That’s
00:42:31.599 carried. and your motions, Director
00:42:34.160 Vanesh.
00:42:35.920 >> Um, thank you. Uh, I will speak to it
00:42:38.640 after I make um the motion. Um, I’ll
00:42:41.599 move that the committee recommend that
00:42:42.880 the board approve grants and aid to be
00:42:44.800 paid from the electoral area B grant and
00:42:46.560 aid budget as follows. $5,000 to the
00:42:49.440 Friends of Cortez Island to assist with
00:42:51.119 the new website. $4,100 to the Cortez
00:42:54.319 Island Women’s Resource Society to
00:42:55.920 assist winter operations and community
00:42:57.599 support. $4,000 to the Evagrates Wave
00:43:01.200 and Range Club to assist with volunteer
00:43:03.119 support and appreciation. $5,000 to the
00:43:06.000 Cortez Community Radio Society to assist
00:43:08.400 with LoveFest and the Village Commons
00:43:10.319 Music Series. $5,000 to the Island Death
00:43:13.599 Care Society to assist with facilitating
00:43:15.599 end of life planning and community
00:43:17.520 resilience and $1,900 to the support our
00:43:20.960 senior society to assist with heat pump
00:43:23.200 incentive support.
00:43:25.440 >> Second.
00:43:26.079 >> Thank you, director. Any discussion on
00:43:28.319 those?
00:43:29.760 >> Yes, if I may, chair. I just wanted to
00:43:32.480 >> I just wanted to um let folks know we
00:43:34.880 had almost over $50,000 worth of of
00:43:38.000 applications come in as you’ll see in
00:43:39.520 theund almost 180 pages of of uh report.
00:43:44.240 Um and uh similar to the last couple of
00:43:47.119 years, uh I worked with the Cortez
00:43:50.240 Island Community Foundation. We put
00:43:52.400 together a community jury ensuring that
00:43:54.720 the jury all the jury members did not
00:43:56.960 have a you know weren’t board members or
00:43:58.640 staff of any of the applications that
00:44:00.720 came in. Um and this year we are
00:44:03.440 delighted that the Cortez Community
00:44:04.960 Foundation raised an additional $25,000
00:44:08.960 um to to support these applications. And
00:44:12.000 although you know we’re supporting
00:44:14.079 $25,000 through uh or you know if this
00:44:16.640 is approved by the board we’ll be
00:44:18.160 supporting $25,000 worth of grants these
00:44:20.240 organizations. But I’m delighted to let
00:44:21.680 folks know that almost the full
00:44:23.680 applications are actually going to be uh
00:44:25.359 funded through uh the additional support
00:44:27.280 from the community foundation. Thank
00:44:28.880 you.
00:44:29.839 >> All right. Call the question on the
00:44:31.359 motion. All those in favor
00:44:33.839 and that is unanimous and that’s
00:44:35.280 carried. Number nine, request financial
00:44:37.359 assistance at D O Bay Lake.
00:44:40.000 >> Like to move a receipt on that.
00:44:42.880 >> Second. Denny seconded. Any discussion?
00:44:46.319 Director Rice. No. All those in favor
00:44:49.040 have receipt. That’s unanimous and
00:44:51.280 carried. The motion director
00:44:53.359 >> like to move item B that the committee
00:44:55.040 recommend that a grant in aid for the
00:44:56.880 Campbell River citizens on patrol in the
00:44:59.440 amount of $2,000 to assist with the 2026
00:45:03.040 oper operational costs be paid from
00:45:05.839 electoral area D grant aid budget.
00:45:08.720 >> Second.
00:45:09.200 >> Thank you Denny. All those in favor?
00:45:12.240 That’s unanimous and carried. The bylaws
00:45:15.680 number 629 D transit service for
00:45:18.319 receipt.
00:45:18.880 >> Move receipt.
00:45:20.560 >> Second.
00:45:20.960 >> Second.
00:45:22.079 >> Second.
00:45:23.040 >> Okay, we’ll take director on that staff.
00:45:25.680 Anything on this?
00:45:27.040 >> Um, no nothing. Staff, excuse me.
00:45:30.480 >> Anything from directors?
00:45:31.599 >> There’s a couple options there, though.
00:45:32.960 >> Yeah,
00:45:34.160 >> I don’t have anything up, but I’m going
00:45:35.760 to move an option.
00:45:36.720 >> Thank you. Okay, honor seat. Then all
00:45:38.640 those in favor?
00:45:40.560 It’s unanimous and carried. Director
00:45:41.920 Rice
00:45:42.560 >> like to move item option B that the
00:45:44.960 committee recommend that bylaw number
00:45:46.800 629 be forwarded to the board for
00:45:49.440 consideration in its current form.
00:45:53.680 >> Second.
00:45:54.319 >> Second. Director Moody discussion. All
00:45:56.960 those in favor?
00:45:58.800 That’s unanimous and carried. Um, just
00:46:02.319 before we uh terminate here, I just want
00:46:05.280 to ask staff that um electoral area
00:46:08.800 joint grant a service, will that come to
00:46:11.040 the board in January?
00:46:13.520 >> It is scheduled. Yes.
00:46:14.960 >> Scheduled. Thank you. All right. We’re
00:46:17.119 looking for a motion to terminate.
00:46:20.000 >> Move termination.
00:46:21.119 >> Second.
00:46:21.680 >> Thank you. All those in favor? Unanimous
00:46:24.400 and carried.
00:46:25.040 >> Mike. Mike.
00:46:26.079 >> Thanks, everyone.
00:46:28.079 >> Nice to see you, Mark. Volume’s good
00:46:30.160 now.

Abandoned Komoks Village Circa 1917

Sayward Historical Society information indicates that the Komoks First Nation experienced traumatic flooding and illness in short order that resulted in the Komoks Nation leaving their Salmon River settlement, consolidating with others in the Comox Valley. If you have any further information or correction to this, please reach out to SaywardHistoricalSociety@gmail.com.

Sayward Historical Society post here: https://www.saywardhistoricalsociety.com/abandoned-komoks-village-circa-1917/

Plankton Are Small Aquatic Drifters With A Big Impact

Plankton are an incredibly diverse group of organisms that inhabit oceans, lakes, and rivers. They range from microscopic bacteria and algae to small animals like crustaceans and gelatinous creatures. What unites them is their limited ability to swim against currents, leaving them to drift wherever the water carries them. Some species remain plankton for their entire lives, while others — including many fish and shellfish — are plankton only during their earliest developmental stages.

Despite their minuscule size, plankton are fundamental to life in the Pacific Ocean and the health of aquatic ecosystems.

Keeping Earth Habitable

Phytoplankton, the plant-like members of the plankton community, use sunlight to convert carbon dioxide and water into organic matter and oxygen through photosynthesis. Remarkably, they generate roughly half of the oxygen in Earth’s atmosphere.

They also play a major role in climate regulation. Through the biological pump, phytoplankton help transfer carbon from the atmosphere into the deep ocean, reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide and helping stabilize global temperatures over long timescales.

The Base of Aquatic Food Webs

Plankton sit at the foundation of nearly every aquatic food web. Phytoplankton produce the organic material that nourishes zooplankton, which in turn feed fish, seabirds, and marine mammals.

Countless species — from small fish and shellfish to the largest whales — depend directly or indirectly on plankton for survival. Plankton also support water quality by filtering particles and breaking down organic matter.

Economic Value

Because they underpin aquatic food webs, plankton are vital to pacific fisheries and the coastal communities that depend on them. Some species, such as krill and certain jellyfish, are harvested directly for food, aquaculture, and nutritional supplements.

Over geological time, plankton have even contributed to modern energy resources. The remains of ancient plankton that settled on the seafloor millions of years ago helped form today’s oil and natural gas deposits.

Cultural and Social Importance

Healthy plankton populations enhance recreation, tourism, and cultural experiences. Plankton blooms can influence activities like swimming and boating, while bioluminescent plankton create glowing waters that captivate visitors. Their intricate shapes and patterns have also inspired art, design, and scientific illustration across cultures.

Why Plankton Matter

Often overlooked, plankton are essential to life. They generate oxygen, regulate climate, support marine food webs, sustain economies, and enrich human culture. Protecting aquatic environments means safeguarding plankton — and the countless systems that rely on them.

Ottawa Greenlights Plastic Straw Production For Everywhere Except Canada

The federal government has reversed part of its planned phase‑out of single‑use plastics, allowing Canadian manufacturers to resume exporting products such as plastic straws, cutlery, and other items that remain banned within Canada.

The shift comes just as a full export ban was about to take effect. Under the updated policy, companies may once again produce these plastics as long as they are intended exclusively for foreign markets. Government officials say the change reflects concerns that prohibiting exports would damage Canada’s plastics industry without meaningfully reducing global pollution.

A regulatory analysis from the Environment Department found that halting exports would have little impact on worldwide plastic waste, noting that international buyers would simply turn to suppliers in other countries. Canada’s plastics sector generates tens of billions of dollars in economic activity annually—much of it export‑driven—and industry groups had warned that an export ban could jeopardize jobs and investment.

The broader regulatory effort began in 2022, when Ottawa introduced rules banning the manufacture and domestic sale of several common single‑use plastic items, including straws, grocery bags, stir sticks, cutlery, and six‑pack rings. While these products remain prohibited for use within Canada, the new reversal allows manufacturers to meet demand abroad.

Environmental organizations have sharply criticized the decision, arguing that it weakens Canada’s leadership on pollution and climate issues. They contend that permitting production solely for export sends conflicting signals about the country’s commitment to reducing plastic waste and could undermine global efforts to curb plastic pollution.

The government’s policy adjustment underscores the ongoing tension between environmental goals and economic considerations as Canada continues to refine its plastics strategy in the years ahead.

How the Canadian Government Broadened State Powers in 2025

In 2025, the federal government under Prime Minister Mark Carney introduced a series of legislative changes that critics argue significantly expanded state authority while reducing individual freedoms.

One of the most debated developments was the passage of Bill C-2, a wide-ranging financial and border security bill. While presented as routine administrative legislation, opponents say it granted the federal government expanded powers to access personal information at border crossings. This included access to sensitive records such as medical, therapeutic, and postal information without requiring a warrant. Civil liberties advocates raised concerns that these measures weakened long-standing privacy protections.

Later in the year, attention turned to Bill C-9, which the government framed as an effort to combat hate speech. Critics, however, argued that the legislation crossed into new territory by allowing increased oversight of religious expression. Concerns were raised that sermons, teachings, and faith-based communications could be subject to government scrutiny, marking a shift in how religious freedom has historically been protected in Canada.

Beyond individual pieces of legislation, observers pointed to a broader pattern of increased federal control over financial systems, personal data, and public expression. These concerns were reinforced by earlier government actions, including the freezing of bank accounts during past protest movements, which critics say demonstrated a willingness to bypass traditional legal safeguards during times of political tension.

Those skeptical of the government’s direction argue that the cumulative effect of these measures represents a fundamental change in the relationship between Canadians and the state. Rather than one dramatic policy shift, they say the expansion of power occurred gradually, with limited public debate and minimal transparency.

Supporters of the government maintain that the measures were necessary to address security, misinformation, and social cohesion in an increasingly complex world. Critics counter that safeguarding democracy requires constant vigilance, particularly when emergency powers or broad authorities become normalized.

The debate over state power and personal freedom is expected to remain a central issue in Canadian politics as the long-term impacts of the 2025 legislative agenda continue to unfold.