The Village of Sayward Council Meeting – Tuesday, May 26th

The Village of Sayward has announced its Regular Meeting of Council scheduled for Tuesday, May 26, 2026, at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers. This public notice invites residents to participate in local governance.

Why This Meeting Matters

Local council meetings are where decisions shaping the community’s future are made — from infrastructure improvements to environmental initiatives. Sayward’s open-door approach ensures transparency and encourages residents to share their perspectives directly with the Mayor and Council.

How to Participate

  • Attend in person: The meeting will be held in the Council Chambers.
  • Submit questions or comments: Written submissions are accepted until the meeting begins.
  • Reach out via email: Send your thoughts to village@saywardvalley.ca.
  • Drop off letters: Deliver them to the Village Office at 652 H’Kusam Way, Sayward, BC.

Village Of Sayward Street Sweeping – May 26

The Village of Sayward would like to inform residents that annual municipal street sweeping operations will take place throughout the community on Tuesday, May 26, 2026, beginning at 8:00 a.m. Sweeping activities are expected to continue for most of the day as crews work to clean roadways across the Village.

Residents are kindly requested to assist with this important maintenance program by removing parked vehicles from streets and roadways during scheduled sweeping hours whenever possible. Clear road access allows crews to complete the work more efficiently and helps ensure that all areas can be properly cleaned.

Motorists are reminded that street sweeping equipment travels slowly and may make frequent stops while operating. Drivers are encouraged to use caution, reduce speed, and exercise patience when approaching or passing sweeping crews to help keep both workers and the public safe.

Street sweeping is an essential service that contributes to the cleanliness, safety, and environmental health of our community. By removing sand, dirt, leaves, litter, and other debris from road surfaces, the program helps:

  • Improve roadway appearance and safety
  • Reduce dust and airborne pollutants
  • Prevent debris from blocking storm drains
  • Protect nearby streams, waterways, and marine environments from contamination

The Village of Sayward Suddenly Withdrew Its Quorum Reduction Petition

In a surprising turn of events, the Village of Sayward has abandoned its Petition to the Supreme Court of British Columbia related to section 129 Community Charter. Originally filed in October, 2025, the Petition sought to reduce the number of councillors required for quorum to only two. This stunning reversal comes mere days after Mayor Mark Baker’s defamation lawsuit against prior CAO John France was dismissed.

If the quorum issue was as critical to the smooth operation of the municipality as described in The Village of Sayward’s October 2025 media release, why is it no longer important? How many taxpayer dollars were wasted during this drawn out legal process for seemingly nothing? We’ve reached out to The Village of Sayward and the PR firm they hired, Coast Communications and Public Affairs, for comment.

Summary of Petition Withdrawal

The May 14, 2026 BC Supreme Court requisition confirms that the Village of Sayward abandoned its Section 129 petition before the scheduled June hearing.

Key points from the document:

  • Filed in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Victoria Registry (File No. 2512336)
  • Filed by Dana Goodfellow, lawyer for the Village of Sayward
  • Requested removal of the petition hearing from the June 1, 2026 chambers hearing list
  • The petition had originally been filed October 14, 2025 under Section 129 of the Community Charter
  • The document explicitly states:

“The Village of Sayward will not be proceeding with the hearing of its Petition … or the order sought within the Petition.”

In practical terms, the Village withdrew or discontinued pursuit of the court order it had previously sought under Section 129 of the Community Charter.

Looking Back To October 2025

Village of Sayward Statement October 15, 2025

The October 15, 2025 media release announced that the Village of Sayward had filed a petition in BC Supreme Court seeking to temporarily reduce council quorum from three councillors to two.

The Village said the move was intended to:

  • help council function effectively under the Community Charter,
  • restore “order, civility, and professionalism,”
  • and allow council to continue making decisions and advancing priorities such as economic development, grants, and asset management.

The release stated that council had struggled with governance issues since the last election, including the resignation of two councillors and the need for a by-election.

The Village argued that ongoing dysfunction threatened long-term municipal stability in the community of roughly 350 residents.

The statement concluded by saying the matter was before the courts and no further comment would be made.

Village of Sayward Petition Filed October 14, 2025

The document is a petition filed in the Supreme Court of British Columbia by the Village of Sayward under section 129 of the Community Charter.

Main purpose of the petition

The Village is asking the court to temporarily reduce council quorum requirements from three councillors to two councillors so remaining councillors can deliberate and vote on possible disciplinary actions.

Key allegations

The petition alleges that councillors Susan Poulsen and Scott Burchett may have:

  • Violated conflict-of-interest and conduct provisions under the Community Charter and Village bylaws.
  • Improperly disclosed confidential information from closed council meetings.
  • Engaged in disrespectful behaviour toward former Chief Administrative Officer Keir Gervais.
  • Potentially participated in wilful misconduct.

The petition also references possible legal action against at least one councillor, possible Village staff involvement, and allegations involving John France for allegedly assisting in possible misconduct.

Background included in the petition

The filing outlines:

  • The structure of Sayward council.
  • Recent resignations and by-elections that changed council composition.
  • The municipality’s small size and isolated location.
  • Details about council procedure bylaws and code-of-conduct bylaws.

Relief sought

The Village wants the court to allow councillors Debbie Coates and Jason Johnson to proceed with discussions and votes despite quorum complications arising from the allegations involving the other councillors.

The petition also seeks costs if the application is opposed.

Additional Documents

Affidavit of Mark Baker

This affidavit was sworn by Mark Baker in support of a court petition by the Village of Sayward seeking permission to temporarily reduce council quorum requirements.

Main purpose

The affidavit supports an application to the Supreme Court of British Columbia to allow two remaining councillors — Debbie Coates and Jason Johnson — to continue council business involving disciplinary matters despite conflict and quorum issues involving other councillors.

Main allegations described

The affidavit outlines allegations that councillors Susan Poulsen and Scott Burchett may have:

  • Improperly disclosed confidential information and documents from closed council meetings.
  • Breached provisions of the Community Charter and Village bylaws.
  • Engaged in disrespectful conduct toward former CAO Keir Gervais.
  • Potentially participated in wilful misconduct.

The affidavit also references possible legal proceedings involving councillors, Village staff, and John France for allegedly assisting in possible misconduct.

What the affidavit seeks to enable

The reduced quorum would permit council to:

  • Resume consideration of a motion of censure and sanctions.
  • Discuss possible litigation.
  • Continue governance functions that would otherwise be stalled because councillors facing allegations cannot participate in those matters.

Overall tone and significance

The affidavit presents the situation as a governance and operational crisis for the Village, arguing court intervention is necessary so municipal business can continue despite conflicts involving sitting councillors.

Exhibits of Mark Baker Affidavit

Main themes across the exhibits

1. Complaints about mayoral conduct

Several exhibits relate to allegations involving Mayor Baker’s behaviour and interactions with councillors, staff, and others. These include:

  • Emails and written complaints.
  • References to alleged inappropriate jokes and comments.
  • Apology correspondence from Baker acknowledging that some people felt offended or disrespected.
  • Materials connected to harassment and code-of-conduct complaints.

One exhibit includes a written apology from Baker stating he never intended to offend anyone and would try to avoid repeating conduct that others perceived as inappropriate.

2. Internal political conflict on council

The exhibits show an escalating political divide within council involving:

  • Susan Poulsen
  • Scott Burchett
  • Mayor Baker
  • Other council members and residents

Documents suggest disputes over:

  • Closed-meeting confidentiality.
  • Council procedure.
  • Investigations into complaints.
  • Spending of taxpayer funds.
  • Whether disciplinary processes were fair or politically motivated.

3. “Sayward Rant & Rave” social media activity

A substantial portion of the exhibits appears to consist of screenshots from the Facebook group “Sayward Rant & Rave.”

These posts discuss:

  • Alleged misconduct by council members.
  • Criticism of the mayor and council majority.
  • Concerns about municipal spending and investigations.
  • Claims that governance in Sayward had become dysfunctional.

The posts repeatedly characterize the complaint process as politically motivated and expensive for taxpayers.

4. Communications involving John France

The exhibits include emails and meeting arrangements involving John France, Susan Poulsen, and Scott Burchett.

These documents appear intended to support allegations that:

  • Certain councillors coordinated responses to the governance dispute.
  • External assistance may have been provided regarding complaints, strategy, or public communications.

5. Defamation and legal dispute materials

The later exhibits appear to include portions of court pleadings connected to a defamation lawsuit involving Mayor Baker and online/public statements about him.

These materials include:

  • Defences to alleged defamatory statements.
  • Arguments about truth, qualified privilege, and public-interest criticism.
  • Detailed responses to allegations regarding behaviour and comments attributed to the mayor.

Overall significance

Taken together, the exhibits portray a prolonged and highly public breakdown in relationships within Sayward municipal government. They appear designed to support the Village’s position that:

  • Governance has become impaired.
  • Councillors are deeply divided.
  • Alleged misconduct and confidentiality breaches require formal action.
  • Court intervention is necessary to allow council business to continue despite conflicts and disqualifications.

Affidavit of John Thomas

This affidavit was sworn by John Thomas in support of the Village of Sayward’s application to the Supreme Court of British Columbia for a temporary reduction in council quorum requirements.

Main purpose of the affidavit

Thomas supports the Village’s request to reduce quorum from three councillors to two councillors so remaining council members can:

  • Resume consideration of censure motions and possible sanctions.
  • Discuss possible litigation and misconduct allegations.
  • Continue municipal governance despite conflicts involving other councillors.

Key allegations described

The affidavit repeats and supports allegations that councillors Susan Poulsen and Scott Burchett may have:

  • Improperly disclosed confidential information and documents from closed council meetings.
  • Violated provisions of the Community Charter and Village bylaws.
  • Engaged in disrespectful conduct toward former CAO Keir Gervais.
  • Potentially participated in wilful misconduct.

The affidavit also references possible legal proceedings involving councillors, Village staff, and John France.

Thomas’s role and perspective

Unlike the mayor’s affidavit, this filing appears to come from an administrative and governance perspective. As a former acting CAO and advisor, Thomas presents himself as someone familiar with:

  • Council procedures.
  • Municipal governance requirements.
  • Closed-meeting confidentiality obligations.
  • Operational impacts caused by council dysfunction.

Overall significance

The affidavit reinforces the Village’s argument that governance has become impaired by ongoing disputes, allegations, and conflicts of interest, and that court intervention is needed to allow council operations and disciplinary proceedings to continue.

Exhibits of John Thomas Affidavit

The exhibits attached to the affidavit of John Thomas contain bylaws, correspondence, FOI materials, complaints, emails, legal communications, and governance records related to the ongoing conflict within the Village of Sayward.

Main themes in the exhibits

1. Municipal governance and officer authority

Several exhibits contain:

  • Village bylaws defining the powers and responsibilities of municipal officers and the CAO.
  • References to sections of the Community Charter governing council conduct and administration.
  • Legal and procedural guidance about how councillors can direct staff and how council decisions must be made through formal motions.

These materials appear intended to support the argument that individual councillors cannot independently direct municipal administration outside formal council processes.

2. Freedom of Information and privacy disputes

The exhibits include:

  • FOI requests.
  • Complaints to the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia.
  • Allegations that confidential or in-camera information was improperly disclosed.

Some documents specifically reference concerns that closed-meeting information connected to litigation involving Mark Baker and John France may have been released without proper council authorization.

3. Coordination among councillors and third parties

A significant number of exhibits appear to consist of emails between:

  • Susan Poulsen
  • Scott Burchett
  • John France
  • Other community or regional contacts

The correspondence discusses:

  • Draft complaint letters.
  • Audit and governance concerns.
  • Political strategy and responses.
  • Communications about investigations and elections.

These exhibits appear intended to demonstrate coordination regarding complaints and opposition to the mayor and council majority.

4. Conflict over council procedure and legality

Some exhibits involve:

  • Disputes about meeting notices and procedural compliance.
  • Legal advice regarding council meetings and Community Charter requirements.
  • Communications from former CAO Keir Gervais refusing to proceed with actions believed to be non-compliant with legislation.

The documents portray an administration struggling with competing instructions and governance disputes.

5. Broader political and public controversy

The exhibits also contain:

  • Community planning and operational documents.
  • Election-related complaints and allegations of interference.
  • Records showing the conflict expanded beyond council chambers into public and regional political disputes.

Overall significance

Overall, the exhibits support the Village’s broader argument that:

  • Governance within Sayward had become highly dysfunctional.
  • Confidentiality and procedural disputes escalated into formal complaints and legal action.
  • Relationships among councillors, staff, and members of the public had significantly deteriorated.
  • Court intervention was necessary to restore the municipality’s ability to function and make decisions.

Village of Sayward Budget Shortfall Analysis

The Village of Sayward is confronting a projected 42 per cent property tax increase for 2026, driven by a severe budget shortfall and near-total depletion of its financial reserves. As of March 2026, the village holds less than $2 million in total assets, the lowest of any municipality in British Columbia.

Why the Tax Hike is Necessary

  • Exhausted Reserves: Over the past five years, the village has relied on accumulated surpluses to cover annual deficits of roughly $100,000. With these funds now depleted, property taxes are the only remaining option to fund basic operations.
  • High Legal Costs: Internal council disputes and lawsuits cost the village $302,870 in 2025 alone, nearly 20 per cent of its total revenue.
  • Shrinking Revenue Base: A decline in commercial and industrial properties has left about 350 residents carrying the bulk of the tax burden.
  • Reduced Support: Provincial “Small Community” grants have steadily decreased, while the village reports insufficient assistance from regional authorities.

Potential Measures to Mitigate the Increase

Village staff have already reduced the proposed hike from 50 per cent to 42 per cent through initial cost-cutting. Additional measures under consideration include:

  • Municipal Dissolution: The grassroots Sayward Taxpayers Alliance has petitioned the B.C. Ministry of Municipal Affairs to dissolve the village. If approved, governance would shift to the Strathcona Regional District, potentially lowering administrative costs and providing more stable oversight.
  • Service Cuts: The village has already closed the Kelsey Recreation Centre and canceled several community programs, saving $175,000–$200,000 annually. Further reductions to parks, public works, and other non-essential services may be needed.
  • Governance Stabilization: Ending ongoing legal disputes among council members could immediately eliminate $300,000+ in annual legal fees, a sum exceeding the village’s entire roads and public works budget.
  • Forensic Audit: Some council members are calling for an audit to identify financial mismanagement and opportunities for efficiency.
  • Provincial Intervention: Sayward remains under provincial advisory, with council members hoping the October 2026 municipal election will bring a “like-minded” council capable of stabilizing finances.

The coming months will be critical as Sayward grapples with the dual pressures of fiscal shortfalls and governance instability, while residents face one of the steepest property tax hikes in the province.

Village of Sayward Schedules Committee of the Whole Meeting for March 31 6pm

The Village of Sayward has announced a public Committee of the Whole meeting scheduled for Tuesday, March 31, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Village of Sayward Municipal Office, located at 652 H’Kusam Way. The meeting will be open to the public and provides an opportunity for residents to observe council discussions and gain insight into issues that may shape future municipal decisions.

According to the public notice, the meeting agenda is available on the Village of Sayward website, and printed copies can be obtained at the Municipal Office during regular business hours. A video recording of the meeting will be posted online within three business days, allowing residents who cannot attend in person to stay informed about council discussions. Residents wishing to submit written questions or comments to Mayor and Council may do so up until the start of the meeting at 6:00 p.m. on March 31 by emailing village@saywardvalley.ca or delivering their submissions directly to the Municipal Office.

A Committee of the Whole meeting is a common municipal governance format used across British Columbia and Canada, where the entire council meets as a committee to review issues in detail before making formal decisions at a regular council meeting. Unlike regular council meetings, which focus on passing bylaws, approving motions, and making official decisions, Committee of the Whole meetings are designed to allow more in-depth discussion, exploration of policy options, and detailed review of reports and proposals. This structure allows council members to ask questions, debate ideas, and request additional information from staff without the formal procedural constraints that govern regular council meetings.

Committee of the Whole meetings often serve as the foundation for major municipal decisions. Budget planning, infrastructure projects, policy changes, governance issues, and community concerns are typically reviewed in this setting before moving forward to a regular council meeting for approval. By holding detailed discussions in advance, council can better understand the financial and operational implications of proposed actions and ensure that decisions are informed and transparent.

Typical Committee of the Whole agendas include staff reports on municipal finances, infrastructure maintenance and capital projects, water and sewer systems, public works operations, and grant opportunities. Draft bylaws and policy proposals are frequently presented for discussion, allowing council to consider potential changes to fees, services, or operational procedures. Community issues such as economic development initiatives, regional partnerships, emergency preparedness, and service delivery challenges may also be addressed. In some cases, presentations from community organizations, consultants, or regional partners are included to provide additional information or perspectives.

For residents, Committee of the Whole meetings provide an important window into how local government operates. These meetings often reveal early-stage discussions about property taxes, municipal services, infrastructure investments, and long-term planning. Observing these discussions can help residents understand council priorities, identify emerging issues, and stay informed about potential changes that may affect the community. Because items discussed at Committee of the Whole frequently move to regular council meetings for final approval, attending or reviewing these meetings gives residents an opportunity to raise concerns or provide feedback before decisions are finalized.

Participation is typically limited to observation and written submissions, as formal public speaking opportunities are more commonly provided during regular council meetings or scheduled public hearings. However, reviewing the agenda in advance and submitting written comments allows residents to ensure their perspectives are considered during council deliberations. This process supports transparency and accountability by encouraging public awareness and engagement in municipal decision-making.

Municipal governance in small communities like Sayward often relies heavily on Committee of the Whole meetings to work through complex financial and operational issues, particularly during budget planning periods or when major infrastructure or policy decisions are under consideration. The format allows council to collaborate more openly, explore multiple options, and build consensus before bringing forward formal resolutions.

The Committee of the Whole meeting scheduled for March 31 is expected to follow this standard format, providing an opportunity for council to review current issues and provide direction to staff on future actions. Residents interested in local governance are encouraged to attend or review the meeting recording to stay informed about ongoing municipal discussions and priorities.

The public notice was issued by Andrew Young, MCIP, RPP, Chief Administrative Officer and Corporate Officer, and dated March 27, 2026.