Amid mounting financial strain for many Canadians, the country’s rising immigration levels—particularly through temporary foreign workers and international students—are increasingly associated with elevated youth unemployment and concerns over wage suppression.

While some attribute these labour market challenges to deeper systemic economic issues, calls for reform are now emerging across the political spectrum. B.C. Premier David Eby, for instance, has advocated for a reassessment or potential cancellation of the Temporary Foreign Worker Program, arguing that the influx of nearly one million foreign workers has triggered a wage-depressing “race to the bottom” that disproportionately benefits corporations.

At the federal level, efforts to “reinvent the economy” through ambiguous promises tied to artificial intelligence have drawn skepticism. Critics point to a history of heavy spending, ballooning debt, and underwhelming outcomes. Canada’s assertive trade stance with the United States has similarly failed to yield meaningful gains, coinciding with negative GDP growth and rising unemployment.

Despite official claims of trade diversification, exports beyond the U.S. have declined. The only significant uptick has come from oil shipments via the Trans Mountain Pipeline—an initiative now widely viewed as a costly misstep following federal acquisition and mismanagement.

Canada’s economic trajectory remains troubling. A per capita recession is effectively obscured by rapid population growth, and international observers are beginning to highlight policy failures.

With unemployment climbing, labour force participation falling, and increased scrutiny of foreign worker programs, critics argue that Canada’s economic model is faltering. They also contend that legacy media often dismiss these concerns, branding dissenting voices as xenophobic or racist—further complicating public discourse around immigration and labour policy.

Homeowners in Vancouver may soon face tighter regulations on the use of fireplaces and wood stoves under the city’s Residential Indoor Wood-Burning Bylaw — a policy that some worry could pave the way for an eventual ban on traditional heating methods.

The bylaw requires residents to register their wood-burning appliances and meet strict emissions standards. While city officials claim the goal is simply to monitor and reduce emissions, similar policies in other cities have often led to outright prohibitions.

Montreal is a prime example. Since October 2018, the city has banned all wood-burning stoves and fireplaces that emit more than 2.5 grams of fine particulate matter per hour. Even approved models must remain unused during smog alerts. Penalties for violations start at $500.

In Colorado’s Denver–Boulder area, residents face so-called “Air Quality Action Days” each winter from November to March. On these high-pollution days, most wood burning is banned unless homeowners use EPA- or Colorado Phase III-certified appliances. Violators risk fines starting at $150.

The Dutch city of Utrecht is going even further. Starting in January 2025, new homes will no longer be allowed to install chimneys or flues, and outdoor fire pits will be prohibited. By 2030, the city plans to ban all wood-burning fireplaces and stoves as part of an aggressive clean air campaign.

These escalating restrictions leave many households with dwindling heating options. As carbon taxes and supply constraints continue to push up natural gas prices, wood-burning fireplaces often serve as the final backup for affordable warmth.

The pattern is becoming clear: first comes registration, then regulation — and eventually, removal.

This summer, British Columbia has seen a flurry of emergency alerts—from raging wildfires to a tsunami advisory—highlighting the importance of timely warnings. While the current system has proven its worth, experts say it’s time to rethink how alerts are delivered across the province.

Who Sends the Alerts?

Right now, local governments and First Nations are responsible for initiating emergency alerts. If there’s an immediate threat to life—like an evacuation order—they can request the province to issue a broadcast-intrusive alert. These alerts override TV and radio programming and are sent directly to cellphones in the affected area. Most people are familiar with this system through Amber Alerts.

But here’s the catch: local authorities can’t trigger these broadcast alerts themselves. For lower-level threats—like the July 30 tsunami advisory—communities must rely on their own websites, social media, or third-party platforms like Alertable or Voyent Alert.

Too Many Systems, Too Much Confusion

This fragmented approach can be problematic, especially in areas with overlapping jurisdictions. In Greater Victoria alone, 13 municipalities use at least four different alert systems, creating confusion for residents.

Shaun Koopman, emergency services manager for the Strathcona Regional District, believes it’s time for a more streamlined solution. He’s advocating for a single alert provider contracted by the province to serve both provincial and local governments.

Under this model, residents could subscribe to one platform and receive alerts from any community they live in, work in, or travel through. Koopman argues this would reduce costs for local governments and First Nations, who currently fund their own systems.

“It’s one default system… so every member of the public and every community at least has that blanket coverage,” Koopman said.

More Ways to Reach More People

Tarina Colledge, chair of the B.C. Association of Emergency Managers, supports the idea. She says a unified system could deliver alerts via text, email, and even landline calls—ensuring rural residents and older adults aren’t left behind.

Not Everyone’s Convinced

Still, some officials prefer the current setup. Erin Stockill, emergency program officer for the District of Saanich, argues that broadcast-intrusive alerts are more effective because they reach people near the danger zone instantly—without relying on user subscriptions.

“There’s no guarantee that someone who’s subscribed is in close proximity to the hazard,” Stockill said. “This broadcast system ensures speed and effectiveness so the people who need to know will be made aware.”

What’s Next?

When asked about adopting a single-provider model, the Ministry of Emergency Management and Climate Readiness didn’t give a direct answer. Instead, it emphasized that it reviews each emergency—whether it’s a tsunami, wildfire, or flood—to identify areas for improvement.

Summary

We are looking for other like-minded, committed, hard working, energetic people to share our land and way of life with. We are hoping that by sharing our knowledge and skills, as well as our land, we will create a healthy, vibrant homesteading community. A collaborative, long-term arrangement is a possibility for the right person or family. Ultimately, we would like to see a land succession model that allows us to age in place on our homestead while providing an opportunity for new people interested in this type of lifestyle to access land more affordably.

About the Opportunity

We have retired and hope to live the remainder of our lives on our land while seeing the homestead develop with a successional plan in place. We feel that this property has the potential to support more than one family, and we would be happy to share our way of life with other like-minded, committed, hard working, energetic people. We are hoping that by sharing our knowledge and skills, as well as our land, we will create a healthy, vibrant homesteading community and provide an opportunity for new people interested in this type of lifestyle to access land more affordably. If you want more information about us, please go to our blog at Storytelling – The adventure goes on ….

In our current environment of unpredictable weather and rising costs of living, we are working towards developing a resilient, sustainable, subsidence homestead. Currently, we generate more than 80% of our own electricity using solar and picohydro systems and grow/forage approximately 60% of our own food. Our young orchard, once it reaches production, will further increase the amount of food we can harvest from the property. Adding small livestock (chickens, sheep, goats, pigs, rabbits) would bring our food sustainability close to 100%. We have lived on the property for 10 years, and during the floods, droughts, and COVID pandemic which have devastated British Columbia, we have been amazingly sheltered.

Our main reasons for seeking additional participants in our homesteading endeavor are companionship, development of a small “community” with enhanced self-reliance, safety, and livestock care when we must be away from the property. This is not a job offering or a money-making opportunity. This is a chance for the adventurous-at-heart to engage in an incredible nature-oriented, healthy, and fulfilling lifestyle.

We seek to manage the land for long-term sustainability, based on permaculture principles (see Permaculture Design Project for Port Neville) and other ecologically sound practices. We do not practice unsustainable harvesting of the land, and approximately 80% of the property is being retained as a wildlife habitat.

CLICK TO SEE ORIGINAL POST FOR MORE DETAILS

Focused currently on South Vancouver Island, this innovative initiative has potential to expand if successful.

A transformative collaboration between Island Health and BC Emergency Health Services (BCEHS), which manages the BC Ambulance Service, has established new pathways for patients who do not need emergency department (ED) care.

Link and Referral Units (LARUs) are specialized paramedics in minivans who assess and treat 911 patients with non-urgent conditions. These patients often benefit from care at Urgent and Primary Care Centres (UPCCs) rather than EDs. Currently, six UPCCs in Victoria are part of this partnership, with discussions ongoing for expansion into Nanaimo.

“The primary objective for LARU paramedics is to connect non-urgent 911 patients with the most suitable care, which could be a UPCC,” said Kayla Welwood, Manager, Low Acuity and Integrated Care at BC Emergency Health Services. “There are numerous exceptional services beyond emergency departments, and it’s logical to integrate them whenever possible.”

Launched from a single pilot unit in 2020, LARU has grown to 18 units across the province, including in Victoria and Nanaimo. The LARU/UPCC partnership within Island Health began in May 2024, optimizing care for lower acuity patients in the 911 system. This new UPCC referral partnership also extends to emergency ambulances when appropriate.

“Our traditional model was to transport patients directly to the ED. However, we recognized this approach often isn’t ideal for non-emergency patients,” explained Welwood. “Our revised response model integrates our services into the broader health care system, helping patients receive the right care in the right place. LARU paramedics ensure emergency ambulances remain available for the most urgent cases, while alternate care pathways cater to non-urgent patients. This marks a significant shift from the 911 response model of over 50 years ago.”

For South Island and Nanaimo patients dialing 911, the process begins with triage by Emergency Medical Call-Takers (EMCTs) in the BCEHS dispatch centre. If further evaluation is needed, Secondary Triage paramedics in the dispatch centre may contact the patient for additional information. If the case meets LARU guidelines, a LARU paramedic is dispatched to provide a comprehensive assessment and discuss care options with the patient, which may include making an appointment at a UPCC and providing transportation there.

“It’s gratifying to spend more time with patients, listen to their concerns, and utilize my skills for thorough assessments,” said Anthony Hayer, a LARU paramedic with 16 years of experience. “Collaborating with UPCCs enhances outcomes for lower acuity patients.”

“Innovations in health care are crucial. Supporting patients and emergency departments through resource optimization is excellent,” noted Antony Neale, a registered nurse at the Westshore UPCC. “I’m enthusiastic about further expanding this partnership.”

Dr. Kimberley Cameron, a physician at the Westshore UPCC, highlighted the benefits of this program for lower acuity patients. “This initiative provides patients with timely, appropriate care,” she said. “Over time, our collaboration with LARU teams can reduce the number of patients transported to emergency departments.”

Since its inception in May 2024, the partnership has transported 84 patients to UPCCs in Greater Victoria. One tourist, for instance, was treated at a UPCC for an injury instead of visiting a local ED. LARU paramedic Tamara Tulloch, with 14 years of experience, described the positive impact of this care pathway, emphasizing the reduced anxiety for patients avoiding hospital visits.

LARU paramedics consistently receive positive feedback from patients, who appreciate the personalized care. “Our goal is to improve the patient experience,” said LARU paramedic Derek Gytenbeek, with over 5 years of experience. “We value the open dialogues with UPCC staff, discussing improvements for the health care system.”

Cathy Edwards, Manager at Westshore UPCC, stressed the importance of these conversations. “We’ve developed strong relationships with LARU paramedics and BC Ambulance Service, united in providing the right care in the right place for our shared patients.”

As the program grows, health care providers view it as a vital component of Island Health and the broader BC health care system. “We’re excited to contribute to this legacy,” said Tulloch. “It represents the evolution of health care delivery, and we at BCEHS are proud to be part of the solution.”

Patients should continue scheduling appointments for non-urgent medical concerns directly with UPCCs and call 911 in medical emergencies.

Leatherback Sea Turtles are the last surviving members of the family Dermochelyidae, an ancient lineage that dates back 100-150 million years. These turtles are the largest of their kind, weighing up to 900 kg and boasting a shell length of up to 2 meters. Unlike other sea turtles, Leatherbacks don’t have hard shells. Instead, their shells are covered with a leathery, slightly flexible, fibrous tissue overlaying interlocking bony plates. The bluish-black shell has seven ridges running from front to back and tapers to a blunt point, creating a streamlined, teardrop shape. Their front flippers are notably long, often half the length of their shell, and lack claws, which differentiates them from other sea turtles. Additionally, their shells, necks, heads, and front flippers are frequently marked with white or bluish-white blotches. Adult Leatherbacks have a distinct pink patch on their heads, unique in size, shape, color, and pattern. These turtles primarily feed on gelatinous prey like jellyfish and salps. They lack the chewing plates found in other sea turtles, instead having sharp-edged jaws and backward-pointing spines in their mouths and esophagi to help retain and swallow their soft-bodied prey.

Pacific Leatherbacks have two main nesting populations: one in the Eastern Pacific (Mexico and Costa Rica) and one in the Western Pacific (Malaysia, Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea, and Indonesia). The Leatherbacks found in Canadian Pacific waters are part of the Western Pacific population, migrating up to 15,000 km from Indo-Pacific nesting beaches to forage on jellyfish and other gelatinous prey. Sightings in Canadian Pacific waters are rare, with only 126 unique sightings reported in British Columbia from 1931 to 2009. This species’ pelagic nature and the difficulty of spotting them from a distance lead to many uncertainties regarding their habitat use off the coast of British Columbia. The Pacific Leatherback Sea Turtle population has declined by up to 95% in the last 50 years and is currently Endangered.

Females lay about 100 eggs per clutch, several times during a nesting season, typically at 8-12 day intervals. They return to the nesting site every 2-3 years. After approximately two months, hatchlings emerge from the nest and make their way to the ocean, usually at night to avoid predation and reduce the risk of desiccation.

On Indo-Pacific nesting beaches, Leatherback eggs face predation from mammals like pigs and feral dogs. Humans also pose a threat, as Leatherback eggs are considered a delicacy in some countries. Development near nesting beaches negatively impacts hatchlings, as bright lights disorient them, causing exhaustion, dehydration, or predation as they struggle to find the ocean. Despite laying about 100 eggs per clutch and nesting up to 10 times a season, only a few hatchlings survive to adulthood and breed. Leatherback Sea Turtles face numerous human-induced threats in the marine environment. They are often accidentally caught in fisheries, and entanglement in fishing gear is common. While many fishers release trapped Leatherbacks, some turtles drown or sustain fatal injuries before help arrives. Leatherbacks can also get tangled in discarded debris, collide with vessels, or mistake floating plastic bags and debris for jellyfish prey, leading to obstruction of the digestive system and eventual death from starvation.